Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16901

Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging

Path csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Date Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:30:02 +0200
Message-ID <KWvyO-9Qc4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KWu9H-9P7V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWuW5-9PHr-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 11 15:27:11 2025
Old-Return-Path <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Filter OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaout05.partage.renater.fr D05FBA0105
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailer Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4652 (ZimbraWebClient - FF128 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4652)
Thread-Topic dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Thread-Index 8uAjkBBpN4AoXFM+4il0qHYyG0eqdg==
X-Virus-Status Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamscore -100
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugdduvdehudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefkjghfufggtgfgofhtsehtjegttdiitdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrkfevveetucfhrhgvuggvrhhitgdqgfhmmhgrnhhuvghluceofhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleefkeeujefgjeeigefgffffudegheefgfeffeethfetkedtiedvhfeijeeifefgnecukfhppedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudeghedphhgvlhhopeiishhtohhrvgdqsgefqddtuddvrdhprghrthgrghgvrdhrvghnrghtvghrrdhfrhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhhvihhlrgesuggvsghirghnrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhphihthhhonheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23032
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/895197705.132125083.1749654653778.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 12
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:10:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-Message-ID <895197705.132125083.1749654653778.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Original-References <1779402678.132016719.1749649153102.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <e0bd36c3-4e1a-432d-8fb9-a2bb110a82e2@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16901

Show key headers only | View raw

It seems that this is due to setuptools-scm which provide the list of the data during the dpkg-buildpackage.


taken from the doc of setuptools-scm ---
Additionally setuptools-scm provides setuptools with a list of files that are managed by the SCM (i.e. it automatically adds all the SCM-managed files to the sdist). Unwanted files must be excluded via MANIFEST.in or configuring Git archive.
---

And indded via sbuild there is no .git directory so setuptools-scm do not provide the list.

Do we know how to deal with this at the pacakging level. the upstream is using the code  from the git repository, so it is not affected by this issue...

Fred

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 16:00 +0200
  Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 16:50 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:10 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:40 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:10 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
            Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-11 19:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-12 11:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:50 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 19:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200

csiph-web