Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16897

Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging

Path csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Date Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <KWvfr-9Q4b-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KWu9H-9P7V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWuW5-9PHr-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 11 15:09:11 2025
Old-Return-Path <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Filter OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaout04.partage.renater.fr 98EAD14064F
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailer Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4652 (ZimbraWebClient - FF128 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4652)
Thread-Topic dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Thread-Index Apbm9nYA0UtIUQOyRnvXZ8r2s9X3vA==
X-Virus-Status Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamscore -100
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugdduvdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefkjghfufggtgfgofhtsehtjegttdiitdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrkfevveetucfhrhgvuggvrhhitgdqgfhmmhgrnhhuvghluceofhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleefkeeujefgjeeigefgffffudegheefgfeffeethfetkedtiedvhfeijeeifefgnecukfhppedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudeghedphhgvlhhopeiishhtohhrvgdqsgefqddtuddvrdhprghrthgrghgvrdhrvghnrghtvghrrdhfrhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhhvihhlrgesuggvsghirghnrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhphihthhhonheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23029
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1418771816.132111292.1749653531548.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 8
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:52:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-Message-ID <1418771816.132111292.1749653531548.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Original-References <1779402678.132016719.1749649153102.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <e0bd36c3-4e1a-432d-8fb9-a2bb110a82e2@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16897

Show key headers only | View raw

> When using dpkg-buildpackage, try at least using a chroot containing
> only build-essential packages and the build-dependencies.

both are using the python -m build method...

so the setuptools build system has different behaviour depending on other installed  packages ?

Fred

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 16:00 +0200
  Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 16:50 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:10 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:40 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:10 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
            Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-11 19:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-12 11:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:50 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 19:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200

csiph-web