Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16896

Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Date Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <KWuW5-9PHr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KWu9H-9P7V-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 11 14:41:48 2025
Old-Return-Path <sanvila@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-112.416 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.907, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language en-US
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Debian-User sanvila
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23028
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/e0bd36c3-4e1a-432d-8fb9-a2bb110a82e2@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 13
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:41:25 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <e0bd36c3-4e1a-432d-8fb9-a2bb110a82e2@debian.org>
X-Original-References <1779402678.132016719.1749649153102.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16896

Show key headers only | View raw

El 11/6/25 a las 15:39, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel escribió:
> Now if I build the package within sbuild I get this file list.
> [...] 
> And with a simple dpkg-buildpackage on unstable distribution.
> [...]

When using dpkg-buildpackage, try at least using a chroot containing
only build-essential packages and the build-dependencies.

If you have more packages installed than that, there is no guarantee
that the end result will be the same.

Thanks.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 16:00 +0200
  Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 16:50 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:10 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:40 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:10 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
            Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-11 19:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-12 11:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:50 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 19:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200

csiph-web