Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16920

Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Date Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <KWMJj-a1oU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <KWu9H-9P7V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWw1P-9QpA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWwEx-9QT9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWwEx-9QT9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWxqW-9Rsf-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWxqW-9Rsf-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWMpX-a1gZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KWMpX-a1gZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jun 12 09:45:13 2025
Old-Return-Path <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Filter OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaout04.partage.renater.fr 81A2214060D
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailer Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4652 (ZimbraWebClient - FF128 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4652)
Thread-Topic dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Thread-Index fUoWzBWUhEAboQBJBs/PVfwRrg/M+g==
X-Virus-Status Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamstate clean
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamscore -100
X-Renater-Ptge-Spamcause gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugddugeejtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefkjghfufggtgfgofhtsehtjegttdiitdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrkfevveetucfhrhgvuggvrhhitgdqgfhmmhgrnhhuvghluceofhhrvgguvghrihgtqdgvmhhmrghnuhgvlhdrphhitggtrgesshihnhgthhhrohhtrhhonhdqshholhgvihhlrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleefkeeujefgjeeigefgffffudegheefgfeffeethfetkedtiedvhfeijeeifefgnecukfhppedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedutddrvdehgedrvdegtddrudeghedphhgvlhhopeiishhtohhrvgdqsgefqddtuddvrdhprghrthgrghgvrdhrvghnrghtvghrrdhfrhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfrhgvuggvrhhitgdqvghmmhgrnhhuvghlrdhpihgttggrsehshihntghhrhhothhrohhnqdhsohhlvghilhdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtvghfrghnohhrseguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehthhhomhgrshesghhoihhrrghnugdrfhhrpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhphihthhhonheslhhishhtshdruggv sghirghnrdhorhhg
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23052
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1972250136.132551478.1749720486444.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 11
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc thomas <thomas@goirand.fr>, Debian Python list <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:28:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Original-Message-ID <1972250136.132551478.1749720486444.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
X-Original-References <1779402678.132016719.1749649153102.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <192828874.132154814.1749656444710.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <3d962e65-cece-4ffa-8953-f7ee4928d835@goirand.fr> <ep47wdsqpgybczmp4rbcynmo4fsl2pr6xkf44bjvmxwe66pemf@fs7l67tlmz6w> <570179897.132195442.1749662076358.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <6tr4xrqvldbfhtmwr3xjnj3vk4yeqgxdavmqpuavlb4syc42qo@hrpjc3v2tebi> <1194444705.132531643.1749719578530.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <rifq7yk4pt6ypddtftbn7e2ioqu76pfjalt5vbb2d6svleonje@2yndklokl5xe>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16920

Show key headers only | View raw

I found the culprite :)..

a malformed entry_point.

"toto.test" instead of "toto.test:main"

Is there a linter for the pyprojects file ?

Thanks for your help.

Fred

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 16:00 +0200
  Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 16:50 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:10 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:40 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:10 +0200
    Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 17:30 +0200
      Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 17:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200
          Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
            Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2025-06-11 18:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-11 19:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging stefanor@debian.org - 2025-06-12 11:30 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:50 +0200
                Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-12 11:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2025-06-11 19:40 +0200
              Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging thomas@goirand.fr - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
        Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2025-06-11 18:00 +0200

csiph-web