Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16314
| From | Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg |
| Date | 2024-10-03 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <JtvW9-gG49-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Jswrf-g28h-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JswUh-g2I4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <JswUh-g2I4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Salvo (2024.09.30_22:15:34_+0000) > > In what wee is this going to affect Debian? Do we actually verify GPG > > signatures for upstream sources? > > It seems we do not! Fixed. > > Is there any other reason I am not aware of why sigstore is a bad > > solution? > > sigstore is 3rd party signing. You no longer keep the private key yourself. > You keep your password/token/whatever to sigstore and they sign your files. From a quick read of the docs: I think ephemeral keys are used (or can be?) but the signature is recorded into their CT log, with your account. That's the bit signed by their key. > And you hope they'll still be online and secure in the future when you will > decide to check a signature. I see an offline mode is supported. We should figure out what it would take to support sigstore in Debian source packages, assuming there is more adoption. Stefano -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Salvo Tomaselli <ltworf@debian.org> - 2024-09-30 23:50 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Salvo Tomaselli <ltworf@debian.org> - 2024-10-01 00:20 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2024-10-01 02:00 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-10-03 17:30 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-10-03 20:30 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-10-03 22:30 +0200
Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-10-04 20:30 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Mathias Behrle <mbehrle@debian.org> - 2024-10-04 21:30 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2024-10-05 03:40 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-10-05 06:10 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2024-10-05 10:30 +0200
Re: Alternative signature mechanisms for upstream source verification Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2024-10-05 12:40 +0200
Re: python devs are planning to stop signing with gpg Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2024-10-01 00:30 +0200
csiph-web