Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16407
| From | Alexandru Mihail <alexandru.mihail2897@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) |
| Date | 2024-10-27 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JCiZH-4F1u-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JCiGl-4EUQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
First, thank you all for the insightful replies ! > - psrecord as source package name > - python3-psrecord as binary package name (shipping executable and module) > > > Is choosing psrecord as source package name still advisable in the above cases? Or is python-psrecord as source package name better for the executable+module case? > My question towards myself, exactly. Looking forward to more opinions. Perhaps, after we decided, we (I) could update DPT docs with a nifty little table who could help others finding themselves in this niché or similar. > Best regards > > Peter > Have a great one, Alex
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-24 21:40 +0200
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-10-26 17:10 +0200
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 20:20 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 22:10 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-10-27 22:20 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Alexandru Mihail <alexandru.mihail2897@gmail.com> - 2024-10-27 22:30 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 20:50 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-11-11 20:20 +0100
csiph-web