Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16403
| From | Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) |
| Date | 2024-10-27 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JCgXT-4DQY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JBbQB-3XYB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JBbQB-3XYB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JBQAp-4mZJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <JBQAp-4mZJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Scott, On 2024-10-26 17:00:18, Scott Kitterman wrote: > From reading this thread, it seems like psrecord is an application written in > Python. Upstream could, if they felt like it, re-implement the whole thing in > Rust and it would still be psrecord. Assuming that's at least generally > correct, I think psrecord is definitely the correct package name. yes, I think this applies to psrecord. > The only exception is that applications which provide a publically available > module/ extension that other programs can use should provide a binary which > uses the python3-foo naming convention (see spf-engine as an example). It is > a matter of taste and judgement for small applications that provide a public > module/extension should ship the application in a separate binary package or > not. Generally, tiny packages are bad because they require more overhead, > including making the packages file bigger for every single user. In addition psrecord provides a public module (as per [0]) but I am inclined to consider this one of the "small application" cases which do not warrant a separate binary package. Best regards, Peter [0] https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#public-and-internal-interfaces
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-24 21:40 +0200
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-10-26 17:10 +0200
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 20:20 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 22:10 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-10-27 22:20 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Alexandru Mihail <alexandru.mihail2897@gmail.com> - 2024-10-27 22:30 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 20:50 +0100
Re: Upload request: psrecord (NEW) Peter Wienemann <wiene@debian.org> - 2024-11-11 20:20 +0100
csiph-web