Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15926

newer dask release

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject newer dask release
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2024 23:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <IPmuZ-2XV4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jun 14 21:16:56 2024
Old-Return-Path <emollier@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-114.52 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9iuGIbnW1mdIEEIi"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Debian-User emollier
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21962
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZmyzN4EByUPjReSh@fusion.emlwks999.eu
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 83
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Fri, 14 Jun 2024 23:16:39 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <ZmyzN4EByUPjReSh@fusion.emlwks999.eu>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15926

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Diane, Hi Julian

I'm wrapping up that email as it seems to me there could be some
activity on the dask package from several people at once.

I happen to have a look at the dask.dataframe import issues,
which manifest as at least #1068422, #1069821, and #1069359.
The import problem looks fixed in 2024.5.2, but the new version
also introduced a couple of issues:

  * the following change[1] is needed to fix a test failure[2].

    [1]: https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/11177
    [2]: https://github.com/dask/dask/issues/11176

  * dask.distributed failed its supposedly flaky autopkgtest
    with an error which suggests the two packages might have to
    be uploaded in a lockstep:

    	____________ ERROR collecting protocol/tests/test_highlevelgraph.py ____________
    	/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dask/dataframe/__init__.py:22: in _dask_expr_enabled
    	    import dask_expr  # noqa: F401
    	E   ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'dask_expr'

    Besides, dask.distributed build time tests also regress the
    same way.

  * napari is failing to build from source, but I haven't
    checked yet whether this was caused by introduction of the
    new dask or something else.

Otherwise, according to my tests on reverse dependencies and
reverse build-dependencies on amd64, the new dask did not
introduce regressions.  The majority of packages saw their tests
and builds pass, and the rest had existing failures already.

If that helps, I have the package upgrade staging on my drive,
and may push to salsa after a good night of sleep.  In case you
see reasons I missed for not bumping version too soon, or if you
already went through the upgrade steps already, don't hesitate
to tell me to hold my horses.

I did not focus a lot on the sphinxdoc issue described in the
newly opened #1073183.  I'm not very good with dealing with
sphinxdoc, and would be more tempted to copy the bare rst files
than getting the html files back on tracks.

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity
   `-    on air: Suspyre - Siren (One Last Breath)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-14 23:20 +0200
  Re: newer dask release Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2024-06-15 04:50 +0200
    Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-15 11:00 +0200
      Re: newer dask release Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 15:00 +0200
        Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 23:00 +0200
    Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 23:00 +0200
      Re: newer dask release Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-06-17 09:10 +0200
        Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 20:10 +0200
  Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 22:50 +0200

csiph-web