Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15927

Re: newer dask release

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 2024-06-14 at 23:16 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Diane, Hi Julian
> 
> I'm wrapping up that email as it seems to me there could be some
> activity on the dask package from several people at once.


Yeah I saw that and decided I was overloaded and stopped doing
anything.

Historically it was pretty important to dask and dask.distributed to be
released together, upstream intends them to be matching versions, but I
didn't know how to set the the dependnecy version strings to require
that.



> 
> I happen to have a look at the dask.dataframe import issues,
> which manifest as at least #1068422, #1069821, and #1069359.
> The import problem looks fixed in 2024.5.2, but the new version
> also introduced a couple of issues:
> 
>   * the following change[1] is needed to fix a test failure[2].
> 
>     [1]: https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/11177
>     [2]: https://github.com/dask/dask/issues/11176
> 
>   * dask.distributed failed its supposedly flaky autopkgtest
>     with an error which suggests the two packages might have to
>     be uploaded in a lockstep:

Yes very much yes. Is there a way to nag anyone trying to upload dask
to go check the harder to update distributed before uploading?


> 
> If that helps, I have the package upgrade staging on my drive,
> and may push to salsa after a good night of sleep.  In case you
> see reasons I missed for not bumping version too soon, or if you
> already went through the upgrade steps already, don't hesitate
> to tell me to hold my horses.

That all seems promising to me.

> 
> I did not focus a lot on the sphinxdoc issue described in the
> newly opened #1073183.  I'm not very good with dealing with
> sphinxdoc, and would be more tempted to copy the bare rst files
> than getting the html files back on tracks.
> 

If you want to push what you've done I might have time sunday night/
monday to look at the sphinx problem.

Dask is probably complicated enough to be a good candidate for team
maintenance.

Diane

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-14 23:20 +0200
  Re: newer dask release Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2024-06-15 04:50 +0200
    Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-15 11:00 +0200
      Re: newer dask release Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 15:00 +0200
        Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 23:00 +0200
    Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 23:00 +0200
      Re: newer dask release Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-06-17 09:10 +0200
        Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 20:10 +0200
  Re: newer dask release Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 22:50 +0200

csiph-web