Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15811

Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated
Date Tue, 07 May 2024 08:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <IBmEx-bEsC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Iy853-9wLK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IyetP-9AFu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <IyQfL-a0fo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Iz27f-a7t0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ize8p-afaq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IzeUO-afrk-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <IzuGd-apUy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IA8tY-aSMn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <IAKIV-bgKw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IARr3-bl0L-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue May 7 06:37:31 2024
Old-Return-Path <emollier@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-115.739 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.23, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ne2e4lO3pZmkQrhO"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Debian-User emollier
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21841
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZjnMEED34ttMjVGg@fusion.emlwks999.eu
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 89
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 7 May 2024 08:37:04 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <ZjnMEED34ttMjVGg@fusion.emlwks999.eu>
X-Original-References <CA+0c0dXOYw25JmhV5oU2Cvy8osFih+bmqa8wuC-nE58DkpGBHA@mail.gmail.com> <Zi5obTpfZgvahrv9@fusion.emlwks999.eu> <CA+0c0dV28Pi2DgH+9dJueH5sw4SkCJqtZ3vA4HtV6VmU_g6=0Q@mail.gmail.com> <ZjFRa6Zc4Go-X-td@fusion.emlwks999.eu> <ZjIFSZjggfQ89xd7@fusion.emlwks999.eu> <ZjISbKxX3Qu-Tifn@fusion.emlwks999.eu> <CA+0c0dUip1rXzMnC0dK5xBf+4fxwcOc_zncP8USEhVZVDwU=tQ@mail.gmail.com> <ZjVUKyqeWI33f0Cc@fusion.emlwks999.eu> <CA+0c0dWkHXO76PcSxZZwHmAbZ8_rQOs24SNUMq1tAT3tpErnpQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zjf3iyptNiMs3k5T@fusion.emlwks999.eu>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:15811

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Yokota,

Étienne Mollier, on 2024-05-05:
> yokota, on 2024-05-05:
> > I was drop s390x from python-pyppmd build architecture list to pass
> > testing migration.
> 
> I see you ajusted the Architecture field to include all
> currently supported Debian architectures except s390x.  While
> this would avoid building attempts on s390x, this is actually
> not ideal, because future architectures will have to be added by
> hand.  Besides, if s390x were to be supported by upstream, then
> it would be necessary to actively bring back s390x architecture
> to the list, assuming we notice the added support in the first
> place.  If you were to want to signify the package does not
> support other than little-endian architectures, then the current
> recommended practice is for the source package to build depend
> on the package architecture-is-little-endian, and bring
> Architecture field back to the value "any".
> 
> All that being said, I don't believe declaring any form of
> architecture limitation is needed, because the test failure at
> build time prevents the production of packages for unsupported
> architectures.  Please revert Architecture field change; you may
> add the architecture-is-little-endian as build dependency if you
> feel better about not trying to build on other systems, but it's
> not entirely needed in my opinion.

Thanks, I saw you reverted the change about architecture list.

> In any case, the package would not migrate to testing, because
> despite the architecture restrictions, Debian infrastructure[1]
> will continue expecting s390x packages to be built; the
> following migration excuses will continue to appear:
> 
>   * missing build on s390x
>   * arch:s390x not built yet, autopkgtest delayed there
> 
> I opened the package removal bug #1070469 for python-pyppmd on
> s390x[2].  This will resolve the problem on the infrastructure
> side, but requires human intervention from the ftpmaster team,
> so it may take a little time.  I used `reportbug ftp.debian.org`
> to get a template email with all the metainformation needed, and
> filled the blanks with our observations.
> 
> [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-pyppmd
> [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/1070469

The ftpmaster team removed the package from s390x.  As the
package was now suitable for upload, I proceeded (with a minor
change to fix a typo in the changelog).  python-pyppmd should be
able to migrate to testing in a couple of days.

Thank you for your contribution!

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/0, please excuse my verbosity
   `-

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 08:20 +0200
  Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 10:30 +0200
    Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-28 11:50 +0200
    Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-28 13:40 +0200
    Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-28 17:20 +0200
      Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 09:40 +0200
        Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-30 22:20 +0200
          Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-01 11:10 +0200
            Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-01 12:00 +0200
              Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-02 04:50 +0200
                Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-03 23:20 +0200
                Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 13:20 +0200
                Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 16:10 +0200
                Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-05 23:20 +0200
                Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-07 08:40 +0200

csiph-web