Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15811
| From | Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated |
| Date | 2024-05-07 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IBmEx-bEsC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <IzeUO-afrk-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <IzuGd-apUy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IA8tY-aSMn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <IAKIV-bgKw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IARr3-bl0L-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Yokota, Étienne Mollier, on 2024-05-05: > yokota, on 2024-05-05: > > I was drop s390x from python-pyppmd build architecture list to pass > > testing migration. > > I see you ajusted the Architecture field to include all > currently supported Debian architectures except s390x. While > this would avoid building attempts on s390x, this is actually > not ideal, because future architectures will have to be added by > hand. Besides, if s390x were to be supported by upstream, then > it would be necessary to actively bring back s390x architecture > to the list, assuming we notice the added support in the first > place. If you were to want to signify the package does not > support other than little-endian architectures, then the current > recommended practice is for the source package to build depend > on the package architecture-is-little-endian, and bring > Architecture field back to the value "any". > > All that being said, I don't believe declaring any form of > architecture limitation is needed, because the test failure at > build time prevents the production of packages for unsupported > architectures. Please revert Architecture field change; you may > add the architecture-is-little-endian as build dependency if you > feel better about not trying to build on other systems, but it's > not entirely needed in my opinion. Thanks, I saw you reverted the change about architecture list. > In any case, the package would not migrate to testing, because > despite the architecture restrictions, Debian infrastructure[1] > will continue expecting s390x packages to be built; the > following migration excuses will continue to appear: > > * missing build on s390x > * arch:s390x not built yet, autopkgtest delayed there > > I opened the package removal bug #1070469 for python-pyppmd on > s390x[2]. This will resolve the problem on the infrastructure > side, but requires human intervention from the ftpmaster team, > so it may take a little time. I used `reportbug ftp.debian.org` > to get a template email with all the metainformation needed, and > filled the blanks with our observations. > > [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-pyppmd > [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/1070469 The ftpmaster team removed the package from s390x. As the package was now suitable for upload, I proceeded (with a minor change to fix a typo in the changelog). python-pyppmd should be able to migrate to testing in a couple of days. Thank you for your contribution! Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/0, please excuse my verbosity `-
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 08:20 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 10:30 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-28 11:50 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-28 13:40 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-28 17:20 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 09:40 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-04-30 22:20 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-01 11:10 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-01 12:00 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-02 04:50 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-03 23:20 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 13:20 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 16:10 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-05 23:20 +0200
Re: py7zr-related python packages was updated Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-07 08:40 +0200
csiph-web