Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15430

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:50:55PM +0000, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> On 22/01/2024 11:51, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Please could we wait until the "Python 3.12 is a supported version"
> > transition is completed?
> 
> How are you defining that?  python3-defaults 3.11.6+ in testing?  (I was
> previously told 3.12-supporting pandas and numpy in testing, which has
> happened.  I don't think any of these 25 packages are on
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python3-defaults , but I haven't
> checked carefully, and at least influxdb-python and tqdm do have what I
> suspect are Python 3.12 related issues.)

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.12-add.html

We're nearly there (the transition page says it's 99% done), and when
this transition is complete, then python3-defaults 3.11.6+ will be
able to migrate to testing.

I don't fully understand the problem with transitions, but there was a
request to hold back with significant upgrades until a
python3.12-supporting python3-defaults has reached testing.

> > Adding another 25 or so RC bugs at this
> > point will just slow down that transition.
> 
> What exactly do you want not done until then?   Just not uploading pandas
> 2.x to unstable, or is it also a problem to have these bugs marked as RC in
> the BTS?  (In all 22 cases that are in testing at all, the bug is also
> present in the version in testing, so it being RC shouldn't block
> migration.)

Yes - please don't upload it to unstable yet.  Uploading to
experimental is fine.

> > (Unless pandas 1.5 is
> > preventing the transition, that is.)
> 
> It isn't.

Good!

   Julian

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-12-10 14:30 +0100
  Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2023-12-10 21:30 +0100
    Bug#1043240: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1? "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <kingsley@loaner.com> - 2023-12-10 22:10 +0100
      Bug#1043240: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1? Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 00:40 +0100
      Bug#1043240: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1? Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 11:10 +0100
  Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 08:20 +0100
    Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 18:40 +0100
  Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2024-01-21 16:40 +0100
    Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2024-01-21 19:40 +0100
      Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Stelios Moschos <stel.moschos@gmail.com> - 2024-01-21 20:40 +0100
    Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-01-22 13:20 +0100
      Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2024-01-22 22:00 +0100
        Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-01-23 13:40 +0100
          Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2024-01-26 07:50 +0100
            Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-01-26 08:40 +0100

csiph-web