Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15428
| From | "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 |
| Date | 2024-01-22 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HZ9yF-4Tap-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <HYI5r-4Bu8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <H0eoN-ctw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HZ187-4MVp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <H0eoN-ctw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HZ187-4MVp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 22/01/2024 11:51, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Please could we wait until the "Python 3.12 is a supported version" > transition is completed? How are you defining that? python3-defaults 3.11.6+ in testing? (I was previously told 3.12-supporting pandas and numpy in testing, which has happened. I don't think any of these 25 packages are on https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python3-defaults , but I haven't checked carefully, and at least influxdb-python and tqdm do have what I suspect are Python 3.12 related issues.) > Adding another 25 or so RC bugs at this > point will just slow down that transition. What exactly do you want not done until then? Just not uploading pandas 2.x to unstable, or is it also a problem to have these bugs marked as RC in the BTS? (In all 22 cases that are in testing at all, the bug is also present in the version in testing, so it being RC shouldn't block migration.) > (Unless pandas 1.5 is > preventing the transition, that is.) It isn't.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-12-10 14:30 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2023-12-10 21:30 +0100
Bug#1043240: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1? "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <kingsley@loaner.com> - 2023-12-10 22:10 +0100
Bug#1043240: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1? Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 00:40 +0100
Bug#1043240: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1? Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 11:10 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 08:20 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2023-12-11 18:40 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2024-01-21 16:40 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2024-01-21 19:40 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Stelios Moschos <stel.moschos@gmail.com> - 2024-01-21 20:40 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-01-22 13:20 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2024-01-22 22:00 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-01-23 13:40 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2024-01-26 07:50 +0100
Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2024-01-26 08:40 +0100
csiph-web