Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #13088 > unrolled thread

Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.java

Contents

  Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2025-10-23 21:40 +0200
    Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2025-10-23 23:00 +0200
      Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2025-10-27 14:00 +0100
        Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Bastien Roucaries <rouca@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 14:30 +0100
          Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 15:30 +0100
            Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Bastien Roucaries <rouca@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 15:40 +0100
              Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2025-10-27 16:20 +0100
                Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Bastien Roucaries <rouca@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 17:00 +0100
                  Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-10-28 09:50 +0100

#13088 — Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable

Hi,

version 6.0.1 is in experimental for five years now.  Is there any
reason not to upload it to unstable?

For the moment I've upgraded the packaging in Git but I have no idea
about the consequences to upload it to unstable.

Kind regards
   Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#13089

On 23/10/2025 21:36, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> version 6.0.1 is in experimental for five years now.  Is there any
> reason not to upload it to unstable?
> 
> For the moment I've upgraded the packaging in Git but I have no idea
> about the consequences to upload it to unstable.

Hi Andreas,

Did you try ratt to see how it goes?

Emmanuel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13090

Hi Emmanuel,

Am Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:56:52PM +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> > For the moment I've upgraded the packaging in Git but I have no idea
> > about the consequences to upload it to unstable.
> 
> Did you try ratt to see how it goes?

Good question.  I never got ratt working.  I was hoping for comments
from people who know the reasons for the current situation.  It would
be great if someone could confirm some successful ratt run.

Kind regards
    Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13091

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Le lundi 27 octobre 2025, 13:58:51 heure normale d’Europe centrale Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Emmanuel,
> 
> Am Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:56:52PM +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> > > For the moment I've upgraded the packaging in Git but I have no idea
> > > about the consequences to upload it to unstable.
> > 
> > Did you try ratt to see how it goes?
> 
> Good question.  I never got ratt working.  I was hoping for comments
> from people who know the reasons for the current situation.  It would
> be great if someone could confirm some successful ratt run.
Salsa CI doe rbuild now 

no need to use ratt directly 
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#build-reverse-dependencies

rouca
> 
> Kind regards
>     Andreas.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13092

Hi Bastien,

Am Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 02:21:00PM +0100 schrieb Bastien Roucaries:
> Salsa CI doe rbuild now 
> 
> no need to use ratt directly 
> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#build-reverse-dependencies

Excellent hint!

I've pushed via

   git push -o ci.variable="SALSA_CI_DISABLE_BUILD_REVERSE_DEPENDENCIES=0"

which created

   https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/simple-http/-/pipelines/963873 

Lets see how this will work.

Thanks a lot
   Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13093

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Le lundi 27 octobre 2025, 15:25:58 heure normale d’Europe centrale Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Bastien,
> 
> Am Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 02:21:00PM +0100 schrieb Bastien Roucaries:
> > Salsa CI doe rbuild now 
> > 
> > no need to use ratt directly 
> > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#build-reverse-dependencies
> 
> Excellent hint!

I think this should be pushed to the project in a project NEWS

It was done by  Aquila Macedo based of a POC of myself

rouca
> 
> I've pushed via
> 
>    git push -o ci.variable="SALSA_CI_DISABLE_BUILD_REVERSE_DEPENDENCIES=0"
> 
> which created
> 
>    https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/simple-http/-/pipelines/963873 
> 
> Lets see how this will work.
> 
> Thanks a lot
>    Andreas.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13094

Hi Bastien,

Am Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 03:34:22PM +0100 schrieb Bastien Roucaries:
> > > no need to use ratt directly 
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#build-reverse-dependencies
> > 
> > Excellent hint!
> 
> I think this should be pushed to the project in a project NEWS

Definitely!
 
> It was done by  Aquila Macedo based of a POC of myself

Very nice.

To come back to my original question:  It seems

   https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/simple-http/-/pipelines/963873

went fine.  So should I upload the latest version to unstable?

Kind regards
   Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13095

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Le lundi 27 octobre 2025, 16:13:10 heure normale d’Europe centrale Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Bastien,
> 
> Am Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 03:34:22PM +0100 schrieb Bastien Roucaries:
> > > > no need to use ratt directly 
> > > > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#build-reverse-dependencies
> > > 
> > > Excellent hint!
> > 
> > I think this should be pushed to the project in a project NEWS
> 
> Definitely!
>  
> > It was done by  Aquila Macedo based of a POC of myself
> 
> Very nice.
> 
> To come back to my original question:  It seems
> 
>    https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/simple-http/-/pipelines/963873
> 
> went fine.  So should I upload the latest version to unstable?

I suppose and I suppose in the absence of transition for arch:all you need to manually rebuild graddle

rouca
> 
> Kind regards
>    Andreas.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#13096

Hi,

Am Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 04:52:48PM +0100 schrieb Bastien Roucaries:
> > To come back to my original question:  It seems
> > 
> >    https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/simple-http/-/pipelines/963873
> > 
> > went fine.  So should I upload the latest version to unstable?
> 
> I suppose and I suppose in the absence of transition for arch:all you need to manually rebuild graddle

I tried building gradle against libsimple-http-java_6.0.1 in my local
pbuilder.  This build fails unfortunately.  The build with
libsimple-http-java in sid is successful.

I have no idea in how far this information is relevant also for the
Salsa CI pipeline.

Kind regards
    Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.java

csiph-web