Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8896

Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy

From Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy
Date 2016-02-21 18:50 +0100
Message-ID <r4GiT-12G-47@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r3x7Y-6f7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Apc-pQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3AyS-uN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3CKn-23z-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 18.02.2016 um 20:46 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 06:24:17PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 18.02.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
>>> Le 18/02/2016 14:45, Markus Koschany a écrit :
>>>
>>>> According to [1] Tomcat 6 in Wheezy is still affected by a couple of
>>>> security vulnerabilities that were already fixed in Squeeze-LTS and
>>>> Jessie. Would it be sensible to apply the same changes (backporting the
>>>> 6.0.41 release to Wheezy too) or are there any reasons why this has not
>>>> been done before? Has anybody spoken with the Security Team about Tomcat
>>>> security updates in general? Do they approve of backporting newer
>>>> upstream releases?
>>>
>>> Hi Markus,
>>>
>>> I vaguely remember trying to backport the fixes and giving up due to the
>>> complexity. Also the lack of tests in Tomcat 6 makes this operation
>>> rather risky. That's why the LTS Team decided to package a more recent
>>> release in Squeeze.
>>>
>>> I don't know if the Security Team would accept a new upstream release
>>> for Wheezy. Since the LTS Team is probably going to upgrade the package
>>> when they take over the maintenance in April we could ask the Security
>>> Team to do this upgrade earlier.
>>
>> I am in favor of this solution, especially because we haven't heard
>> anything negative about this approach for Squeeze-LTS. If the Security
>> Team agrees I am going ahead and backport this release to Wheezy, test
>> the package and send the debdiff to them.
> 
> Ok, please go ahead.

I have updated the package in Wheezy. It is basically the same one as in
Squeeze-LTS with some minor changes. I didn't change the compat level
for instance and did not add the versioned dependency on libtcnative-1.
libtcnative >= 1.1.30 was backported to Squeeze but it appears that the
actual version 1.1.24 is already sufficient. tomcat6.cron.daily was also
slightly changed in Squeeze-LTS but I decided to keep the Wheezy cron file.

So in short: I imported the new upstream release, applied new security
patches and removed obsolete ones and documented the changes. I have
attached the debdiff between the version in Squeeze-LTS and Wheezy.

Regards,

Markus




Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-18 14:50 +0100
  Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2016-02-18 18:10 +0100
  Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-02-18 18:20 +0100
    Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-18 18:30 +0100
      Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-02-18 20:50 +0100
        Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-21 18:50 +0100
          Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-27 23:50 +0100
            Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-03-14 23:10 +0100
              Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-16 14:30 +0100
                Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-03-25 00:40 +0100

csiph-web