Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8887
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy |
| Date | 2016-02-18 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r3AyS-uN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r3x7Y-6f7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Apc-pQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Am 18.02.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 18/02/2016 14:45, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> According to [1] Tomcat 6 in Wheezy is still affected by a couple of >> security vulnerabilities that were already fixed in Squeeze-LTS and >> Jessie. Would it be sensible to apply the same changes (backporting the >> 6.0.41 release to Wheezy too) or are there any reasons why this has not >> been done before? Has anybody spoken with the Security Team about Tomcat >> security updates in general? Do they approve of backporting newer >> upstream releases? > > Hi Markus, > > I vaguely remember trying to backport the fixes and giving up due to the > complexity. Also the lack of tests in Tomcat 6 makes this operation > rather risky. That's why the LTS Team decided to package a more recent > release in Squeeze. > > I don't know if the Security Team would accept a new upstream release > for Wheezy. Since the LTS Team is probably going to upgrade the package > when they take over the maintenance in April we could ask the Security > Team to do this upgrade earlier. I am in favor of this solution, especially because we haven't heard anything negative about this approach for Squeeze-LTS. If the Security Team agrees I am going ahead and backport this release to Wheezy, test the package and send the debdiff to them. Markus
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-18 14:50 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2016-02-18 18:10 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-02-18 18:20 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-18 18:30 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-02-18 20:50 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-21 18:50 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-02-27 23:50 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-03-14 23:10 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-03-16 14:30 +0100
Re: Tomcat 6 security vulnerabilities in Wheezy Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-03-25 00:40 +0100
csiph-web