Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8752

Re: About Jenkins in Debian

Path csiph.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!sewer!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: About Jenkins in Debian
Date Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:30:03 +0100
Message-ID <qUywj-VO-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qPMgy-434-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQylc-3yp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQLBM-4uu-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQMeu-4Y2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT47f-Ma-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUvf5-6TL-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sun Jan 24 19:25:12 2016
Old-Return-Path <stan.ieugen@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_SCAM1=0.1, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=Y+rNBlg/AKLnu1m/Am86P/U6HRSbh8VEYV71CbaL2gM=; b=h+ApaoO4N0/ukvvjLFKh2UoE2oVpXlbzNEeGCkc/2XphQQT72TY6s9ppqlA+W5c3AO N+BFrPhV141kOup6xlV0GRNF+pMpIK1pfWm0ffKHFRwwEQnxlukVFFECYfVo4e7g0YHN nBpcm50TvqfVDXopEnNnnYwMsgvzFTb+XokVo3k9/cCctRV8damWncnfj/2D9IoVKUgr +sDO2Kh6uVnKcFWLvvYNlrp7syvytNmnReW3A1JMcE+OorAAmowpyyZOAly4tHEiU087 +YMYvTiECCvpRdj+/Rur+Dhf50erUuNhq9SdjzM4dVVFITvlufMkNwrWlxcOOb+lWMdD 0cew==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=Y+rNBlg/AKLnu1m/Am86P/U6HRSbh8VEYV71CbaL2gM=; b=fjAsECvOLmYf2a5b4UuSZOCpy3N83T85VsiHlCiVAh9cjzUFJioA6O8P2UdYeACeBJ Rd1pPxIUzG98w1s0biR+WQDgy6Dk+MzX4ZICnsUPLKqEE2ANgUhENuoo7QDn5Oc9fpu4 6h2anFzMt3Vl7air+4xyg8ZT6ntPydWEmilEC2lUOKLffhQ/we2aVh1wsp27qLyOy7V3 +1DAAUSIXZBvgjvNozR5c+/UneRYUHkCCnT9BzmTn7gaYwH25VfhcxODADLi1RiAEBI1 iG55zdRRnm/zE7Kz5bEgwZ8Xal1D1d/4yKr2H53BgHLoENeps8e1ufzrOJZXD2vi0yu8 fv9g==
X-Gm-Message-State AG10YOR+Aja2hAhKwkW9bRXtTzBJANY8O+MXdkTL4uQfz3tAXop8v18pESFi141M3DexUg==
X-Received by 10.28.3.131 with SMTP id 125mr15275664wmd.14.1453663496358; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:24:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status N1110
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mDUu2FGcRnLk1OQbg7rsd7nbOESTvLaiE"
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19072
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56A524F7.4020105@gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 98
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:24:39 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <56A524F7.4020105@gmail.com>
X-Original-References <5693C485.3030905@apache.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601131910010.7453@tglase.lan.tarent.de> <56975E6F.3050606@apache.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601141013580.10531@tglase.lan.tarent.de> <569FB8A7.3040101@apache.org> <CAKxyyfYzPPQL8tFm87HxS6P5NcYS5a+mJUnUpoSxU6yYSLgtDA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8752

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Kai-Chung Yan,

I don't have an answer to your question but I would like to point out
that gradle [1] does not depend on SBT [2]. They do similar things but
SBT is Scala oriented while Gradle aims to be a more generic build tool.

Regarding your question, from my experience during Debconf Heidleberg I
think Debian will accept any package as long as it is high quality and
maintained. The issues around Jenkins are that it's a big piece of
software with very active development and a big ecosystem of plugins
around it. That makes it a very difficult thing to maintain from a
security point of view. Stability and security means you need to keep
changes to a minimum.

If someone has a better explanation, please feel free to correct me.

[1] http://gradle.org/	
[2] http://www.scala-sbt.org/


On 24.01.2016 17:54, 殷啟聰 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> So if my understanding is right, Jenkins is highly likely to be
> removed from Debian. And the reason behind this is because the release
> cycle of Jenkins is way too short and upstream already provides .deb?
> 
> So this makes me think about what exactly should be packaged into
> Debian. There are not too many softwares providing .deb distributions
> in upstream, but what if some of the softwares whose packages are
> already in Debian starts to provide upstream .deb, will we still have
> the motivation to keep maintaining it? For example, Gradle does not
> have .deb in upstream, but SBT does, and Gradle indirectly depends on
> SBT, then should we package SBT into Debian as well, which even though
> means lots of work?
> 
> So what if there are some new packages that depends on libraries of
> Jenkins and someone wants to package it, what should he do?
> 
> By the way, I am not using Jenkins in daily life, I am simply curious. :)
> 
> Regards,
> Kai-Chung Yan
> 
> 2016-01-21 0:41 GMT+08:00 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>:
>> Le 14/01/2016 10:15, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>>
>>> Hrm, so is upstream’s packaging any good then? I have seen
>>> so many attempts of upstream to package “for” Debian that
>>> I don’t believe them unseen any more…
>>
>> Reproducibility put aside the upstream package is quite good. The
>> dependencies and the paths used are correct. It even managed to upgrade
>> my years old installation of Hudson and turn it into a shiny and up to
>> date instance of Jenkins without losing anything.
>>
>>
>>> … (plus I’d not know which version to pick, and “nobody
>>> ever got fired for buying IB^W^Wusing what’s in Debian” ☺)
>>
>> That's probably true for the upstream jenkins package too ;)
>>
>> Emmanuel Bourg
>>
> 
> 
> 

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-11 16:10 +0100
  Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 17:00 +0100
    Re: About Jenkins in Debian Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:00 +0100
      Re: About Jenkins in Debian Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2016-01-11 19:00 +0100
    Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-11 21:40 +0100
      Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 22:40 +0100
        Re: About Jenkins in Debian is not black OR white Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2016-01-12 18:40 +0100
      Re: About Jenkins in Debian Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 11:00 +0100
  Re: About Jenkins in Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2016-01-13 19:30 +0100
    Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-14 09:40 +0100
      Re: About Jenkins in Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2016-01-14 10:20 +0100
        Re: About Jenkins in Debian Guido Günther <gg@godiug.net> - 2016-01-15 18:10 +0100
        Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-20 17:50 +0100
          Re: About Jenkins in Debian 殷啟聰 <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:00 +0100
            Re: About Jenkins in Debian Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 20:30 +0100
            Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-24 21:20 +0100
            Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-24 22:30 +0100
  Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-29 17:30 +0100

csiph-web