Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8752
| Path | csiph.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!sewer!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: About Jenkins in Debian |
| Date | Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:30:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUywj-VO-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qPMgy-434-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQylc-3yp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQLBM-4uu-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQMeu-4Y2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT47f-Ma-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUvf5-6TL-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Sun Jan 24 19:25:12 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-11.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_SCAM1=0.1, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -7 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=Y+rNBlg/AKLnu1m/Am86P/U6HRSbh8VEYV71CbaL2gM=; b=h+ApaoO4N0/ukvvjLFKh2UoE2oVpXlbzNEeGCkc/2XphQQT72TY6s9ppqlA+W5c3AO N+BFrPhV141kOup6xlV0GRNF+pMpIK1pfWm0ffKHFRwwEQnxlukVFFECYfVo4e7g0YHN nBpcm50TvqfVDXopEnNnnYwMsgvzFTb+XokVo3k9/cCctRV8damWncnfj/2D9IoVKUgr +sDO2Kh6uVnKcFWLvvYNlrp7syvytNmnReW3A1JMcE+OorAAmowpyyZOAly4tHEiU087 +YMYvTiECCvpRdj+/Rur+Dhf50erUuNhq9SdjzM4dVVFITvlufMkNwrWlxcOOb+lWMdD 0cew== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=Y+rNBlg/AKLnu1m/Am86P/U6HRSbh8VEYV71CbaL2gM=; b=fjAsECvOLmYf2a5b4UuSZOCpy3N83T85VsiHlCiVAh9cjzUFJioA6O8P2UdYeACeBJ Rd1pPxIUzG98w1s0biR+WQDgy6Dk+MzX4ZICnsUPLKqEE2ANgUhENuoo7QDn5Oc9fpu4 6h2anFzMt3Vl7air+4xyg8ZT6ntPydWEmilEC2lUOKLffhQ/we2aVh1wsp27qLyOy7V3 +1DAAUSIXZBvgjvNozR5c+/UneRYUHkCCnT9BzmTn7gaYwH25VfhcxODADLi1RiAEBI1 iG55zdRRnm/zE7Kz5bEgwZ8Xal1D1d/4yKr2H53BgHLoENeps8e1ufzrOJZXD2vi0yu8 fv9g== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AG10YOR+Aja2hAhKwkW9bRXtTzBJANY8O+MXdkTL4uQfz3tAXop8v18pESFi141M3DexUg== |
| X-Received | by 10.28.3.131 with SMTP id 125mr15275664wmd.14.1453663496358; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:24:56 -0800 (PST) |
| X-Enigmail-Draft-Status | N1110 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mDUu2FGcRnLk1OQbg7rsd7nbOESTvLaiE" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19072 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56A524F7.4020105@gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 98 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:24:39 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <56A524F7.4020105@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <5693C485.3030905@apache.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601131910010.7453@tglase.lan.tarent.de> <56975E6F.3050606@apache.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601141013580.10531@tglase.lan.tarent.de> <569FB8A7.3040101@apache.org> <CAKxyyfYzPPQL8tFm87HxS6P5NcYS5a+mJUnUpoSxU6yYSLgtDA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8752 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Kai-Chung Yan, I don't have an answer to your question but I would like to point out that gradle [1] does not depend on SBT [2]. They do similar things but SBT is Scala oriented while Gradle aims to be a more generic build tool. Regarding your question, from my experience during Debconf Heidleberg I think Debian will accept any package as long as it is high quality and maintained. The issues around Jenkins are that it's a big piece of software with very active development and a big ecosystem of plugins around it. That makes it a very difficult thing to maintain from a security point of view. Stability and security means you need to keep changes to a minimum. If someone has a better explanation, please feel free to correct me. [1] http://gradle.org/ [2] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ On 24.01.2016 17:54, 殷啟聰 wrote: > Hi, > > So if my understanding is right, Jenkins is highly likely to be > removed from Debian. And the reason behind this is because the release > cycle of Jenkins is way too short and upstream already provides .deb? > > So this makes me think about what exactly should be packaged into > Debian. There are not too many softwares providing .deb distributions > in upstream, but what if some of the softwares whose packages are > already in Debian starts to provide upstream .deb, will we still have > the motivation to keep maintaining it? For example, Gradle does not > have .deb in upstream, but SBT does, and Gradle indirectly depends on > SBT, then should we package SBT into Debian as well, which even though > means lots of work? > > So what if there are some new packages that depends on libraries of > Jenkins and someone wants to package it, what should he do? > > By the way, I am not using Jenkins in daily life, I am simply curious. :) > > Regards, > Kai-Chung Yan > > 2016-01-21 0:41 GMT+08:00 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>: >> Le 14/01/2016 10:15, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : >> >>> Hrm, so is upstream’s packaging any good then? I have seen >>> so many attempts of upstream to package “for” Debian that >>> I don’t believe them unseen any more… >> >> Reproducibility put aside the upstream package is quite good. The >> dependencies and the paths used are correct. It even managed to upgrade >> my years old installation of Hudson and turn it into a shiny and up to >> date instance of Jenkins without losing anything. >> >> >>> … (plus I’d not know which version to pick, and “nobody >>> ever got fired for buying IB^W^Wusing what’s in Debian” ☺) >> >> That's probably true for the upstream jenkins package too ;) >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> > > >
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-11 16:10 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 17:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2016-01-11 19:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-11 21:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 22:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian is not black OR white Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2016-01-12 18:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 11:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2016-01-13 19:30 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-14 09:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2016-01-14 10:20 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Guido Günther <gg@godiug.net> - 2016-01-15 18:10 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-20 17:50 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian 殷啟聰 <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 20:30 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-24 21:20 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-24 22:30 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-29 17:30 +0100
csiph-web