Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8752
| From | Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: About Jenkins in Debian |
| Date | 2016-01-24 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUywj-VO-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qQylc-3yp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQLBM-4uu-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQMeu-4Y2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT47f-Ma-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUvf5-6TL-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Kai-Chung Yan, I don't have an answer to your question but I would like to point out that gradle [1] does not depend on SBT [2]. They do similar things but SBT is Scala oriented while Gradle aims to be a more generic build tool. Regarding your question, from my experience during Debconf Heidleberg I think Debian will accept any package as long as it is high quality and maintained. The issues around Jenkins are that it's a big piece of software with very active development and a big ecosystem of plugins around it. That makes it a very difficult thing to maintain from a security point of view. Stability and security means you need to keep changes to a minimum. If someone has a better explanation, please feel free to correct me. [1] http://gradle.org/ [2] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ On 24.01.2016 17:54, 殷啟聰 wrote: > Hi, > > So if my understanding is right, Jenkins is highly likely to be > removed from Debian. And the reason behind this is because the release > cycle of Jenkins is way too short and upstream already provides .deb? > > So this makes me think about what exactly should be packaged into > Debian. There are not too many softwares providing .deb distributions > in upstream, but what if some of the softwares whose packages are > already in Debian starts to provide upstream .deb, will we still have > the motivation to keep maintaining it? For example, Gradle does not > have .deb in upstream, but SBT does, and Gradle indirectly depends on > SBT, then should we package SBT into Debian as well, which even though > means lots of work? > > So what if there are some new packages that depends on libraries of > Jenkins and someone wants to package it, what should he do? > > By the way, I am not using Jenkins in daily life, I am simply curious. :) > > Regards, > Kai-Chung Yan > > 2016-01-21 0:41 GMT+08:00 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>: >> Le 14/01/2016 10:15, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : >> >>> Hrm, so is upstream’s packaging any good then? I have seen >>> so many attempts of upstream to package “for” Debian that >>> I don’t believe them unseen any more… >> >> Reproducibility put aside the upstream package is quite good. The >> dependencies and the paths used are correct. It even managed to upgrade >> my years old installation of Hudson and turn it into a shiny and up to >> date instance of Jenkins without losing anything. >> >> >>> … (plus I’d not know which version to pick, and “nobody >>> ever got fired for buying IB^W^Wusing what’s in Debian” ☺) >> >> That's probably true for the upstream jenkins package too ;) >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> > > >
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-11 16:10 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 17:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2016-01-11 19:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-11 21:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 22:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian is not black OR white Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2016-01-12 18:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 11:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2016-01-13 19:30 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-14 09:40 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2016-01-14 10:20 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Guido Günther <gg@godiug.net> - 2016-01-15 18:10 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-20 17:50 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian 殷啟聰 <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:00 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieugen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 20:30 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2016-01-24 21:20 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-24 22:30 +0100
Re: About Jenkins in Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2016-01-29 17:30 +0100
csiph-web