Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #8305

Re: OpenJDK 8 transition

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java, linux.debian.ports.mips
Subject	Re: OpenJDK 8 transition
Date	Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:00:01 +0200
Message-ID	<q4wF3-4o6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pR7O9-2HP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRra9-5K8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRAGt-2rb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q41hU-1F0-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4p0S-1T0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org, "debian-mips@lists.debian.org" <debian-mips@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Sep 3 06:54:13 2015
Old-Return-Path	<emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.502 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.182, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.015, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mq+hrX45UhvYnlhlv5OSXR6d7+7Pg8+cxncKbNGyxcA=; b=fk8H0xozZJgHoMaHOlMZDC9/1/XF9J/Eg8QHRkC8TUOwwvhePayF/NATt8EROdZr3e vmyFQprhNT1BNXUS0+HIH42QZWsVz2HFqPNQyLIKwsFPyWHx9ygH/oLRnyTb3WN4vFgB qFCnYrWW4CUWEApnefY8wOopbB1gSR3opizNtaq+39V/fXzruH1t6xAyfF98yWwmBvsB MQXDfaia8iPbOyE+j9H9q374SQKsNMEqXJkJPXSpiU2w9G3HGATOvlGKi0UONWA9CKNB dLHW0J6qa3VGG4Xdp9aL7prkWuSNb4RDG0sL0DnOGx4ykK2FjQY6W+RLe2FC9DgVhDKi x98Q==
X-Received	by 10.194.57.229 with SMTP id l5mr12055640wjq.139.1441263239265; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 23:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status	N1110
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18619
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/55E7EE86.50906@apache.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	18
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:53:58 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<55E7EE86.50906@apache.org>
X-Original-References	<55B73413.4090100@apache.org> <55B8553A.8080204@debian.org> <20150729143640.GA13654@dorf.mancill.com> <55E616EF.2080607@apache.org> <55E77ABF.7040805@debian.org>
X-Original-Sender	Emmanuel Bourg <emmanuel.bourg@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8305 linux.debian.ports.mips:2006

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Le 03/09/2015 00:39, Matthias Klose a écrit :

> I disagree. Please revert mips/mipsel back to gcj, or fix the mips/mipsel builds
> for openjdk-8 (and for openjdk-9).  The other alternative would be not to build
> the packages for mips/mipsel and file RC issues for packages building
> binary-arch packages and unconditionally build-depending on default-jdk.

Hi Matthias,

I switched only the architectures supported by openjdk-8, the others
were left as is [1]. So alpha, lpia, mips, mipsel, mips64el and sh4
still default to openjdk-7 for now. Should we switch them back to gcj
now or wait until openjdk-7 is removed?

Emmanuel Bourg

[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/java-common.git/diff/debian/java_defaults.mk?id=e725edc

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-28 09:50 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 06:30 +0200
    Re: OpenJDK 8 transition tmancill@debian.org - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
      Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-07-29 16:50 +0200
      Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200
        Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 00:50 +0200
          Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-03 09:00 +0200
            Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2015-09-03 14:00 +0200
              Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:20 +0200
                Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2015-09-03 16:50 +0200
                Re: OpenJDK 8 transition John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2015-09-03 17:00 +0200
                Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-03 17:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> - 2015-07-29 16:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Chris West <solo-debian-java@goeswhere.com> - 2015-09-01 22:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200

csiph-web