Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Emmanuel Bourg Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java,linux.debian.ports.mips Subject: Re: OpenJDK 8 transition Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Matthias Klose , debian-java@lists.debian.org, "debian-mips@lists.debian.org" X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Sep 3 06:54:13 2015 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.502 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.182, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.015, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mq+hrX45UhvYnlhlv5OSXR6d7+7Pg8+cxncKbNGyxcA=; b=fk8H0xozZJgHoMaHOlMZDC9/1/XF9J/Eg8QHRkC8TUOwwvhePayF/NATt8EROdZr3e vmyFQprhNT1BNXUS0+HIH42QZWsVz2HFqPNQyLIKwsFPyWHx9ygH/oLRnyTb3WN4vFgB qFCnYrWW4CUWEApnefY8wOopbB1gSR3opizNtaq+39V/fXzruH1t6xAyfF98yWwmBvsB MQXDfaia8iPbOyE+j9H9q374SQKsNMEqXJkJPXSpiU2w9G3HGATOvlGKi0UONWA9CKNB dLHW0J6qa3VGG4Xdp9aL7prkWuSNb4RDG0sL0DnOGx4ykK2FjQY6W+RLe2FC9DgVhDKi x98Q== X-Received: by 10.194.57.229 with SMTP id l5mr12055640wjq.139.1441263239265; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 23:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18619 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/55E7EE86.50906@apache.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 18 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:53:58 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <55E7EE86.50906@apache.org> X-Original-References: <55B73413.4090100@apache.org> <55B8553A.8080204@debian.org> <20150729143640.GA13654@dorf.mancill.com> <55E616EF.2080607@apache.org> <55E77ABF.7040805@debian.org> X-Original-Sender: Emmanuel Bourg Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:8305 linux.debian.ports.mips:2006 Le 03/09/2015 00:39, Matthias Klose a écrit : > I disagree. Please revert mips/mipsel back to gcj, or fix the mips/mipsel builds > for openjdk-8 (and for openjdk-9). The other alternative would be not to build > the packages for mips/mipsel and file RC issues for packages building > binary-arch packages and unconditionally build-depending on default-jdk. Hi Matthias, I switched only the architectures supported by openjdk-8, the others were left as is [1]. So alpha, lpia, mips, mipsel, mips64el and sh4 still default to openjdk-7 for now. Should we switch them back to gcj now or wait until openjdk-7 is removed? Emmanuel Bourg [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/java-common.git/diff/debian/java_defaults.mk?id=e725edc