Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #13089

Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable

Path csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable
Date Thu, 23 Oct 2025 23:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <LJazD-7qna-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <LJ9kd-7pD7-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 23 20:57:32 2025
Old-Return-Path <ebourg@apache.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-22.354 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.658, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Authentication-Results apache.org; auth=none
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language en-US
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23831
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1b1d5a70-5c37-2fac-a655-8604a209b788@apache.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 14
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Thu, 23 Oct 2025 22:56:52 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <1b1d5a70-5c37-2fac-a655-8604a209b788@apache.org>
X-Original-References <aPqDxA8elJ3CVW17@an3as.eu>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:13089

Show key headers only | View raw


On 23/10/2025 21:36, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> version 6.0.1 is in experimental for five years now.  Is there any
> reason not to upload it to unstable?
> 
> For the moment I've upgraded the packaging in Git but I have no idea
> about the consequences to upload it to unstable.

Hi Andreas,

Did you try ratt to see how it goes?

Emmanuel

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2025-10-23 21:40 +0200
  Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2025-10-23 23:00 +0200
    Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2025-10-27 14:00 +0100
      Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Bastien Roucaries <rouca@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 14:30 +0100
        Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 15:30 +0100
          Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Bastien Roucaries <rouca@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 15:40 +0100
            Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2025-10-27 16:20 +0100
              Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Bastien Roucaries <rouca@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 17:00 +0100
                Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2025-10-28 09:50 +0100

csiph-web