Path: csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Emmanuel Bourg Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.java Subject: Re: Is it time to upload simple-http 6.0.1 to unstable Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 23:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 23 20:57:32 2025 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-22.354 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.658, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 Authentication-Results: apache.org; auth=none MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/23831 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1b1d5a70-5c37-2fac-a655-8604a209b788@apache.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 14 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 22:56:52 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <1b1d5a70-5c37-2fac-a655-8604a209b788@apache.org> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:13089 On 23/10/2025 21:36, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > version 6.0.1 is in experimental for five years now. Is there any > reason not to upload it to unstable? > > For the moment I've upgraded the packaging in Git but I have no idea > about the consequences to upload it to unstable. Hi Andreas, Did you try ratt to see how it goes? Emmanuel