Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12787

Re: OpenJDK 21

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: OpenJDK 21
Date Fri, 12 Jul 2024 07:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <IZgRj-1woa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IZfBU-1vna-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <IYXOF-1kuC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <IZfBU-1vna-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 12 05:13:00 2024
Old-Return-Path <doko@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -2.7
Old-X-Envelope-From doko@debian.org
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language en-US
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23482
List-ID <debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/a25c16c9-3d1e-4939-86c3-d1864a6940ae@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 26
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Fri, 12 Jul 2024 07:12:32 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <a25c16c9-3d1e-4939-86c3-d1864a6940ae@debian.org>
X-Original-References <2BbSxiWk5cbIhjh9lQcQrbh3jXmEjQNmj3PIjgBMboU7bBnXjcyM9LoASM0K3sOJm9S5PpMlPrGn-8i0pq_OrA==@protonmail.internalid> <66a4710c-f520-4452-befa-d368719bb584@debian.org> <ZpCqIpXMMzSejm_5@kubus>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12787

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12.07.24 05:59, tony mancill wrote:
> Is the intent to allow OpenJDK 21 to migrate to testing, or to get it
> into unstable and block the migration?

I don't understand that. OpenJDK 21 is in testing, this is about 
changing the default to 21 in java-common.

>> I don't want to drive this transition on my own (besides the java-common
>> upload), I still have to do some other transitions.
> 
> I'm not in a position to offer to drive this transition end-to-end, but
> can provide sponsoring and routine maintenance support.  I will start by
> resuming working through the reported issues in the BTS.
> 
>> PS: I'll be at DebConf, but I doubt we'll have much attendance from the
>> debian-java team there.
> 
> If there are suitable facilities for video conference at Debconf, we
> could schedule a Java BoF to discuss your plans.  Afternoon in GMT+9
> will the morning in Europe and late evening in the evening in the US.
> (Of course, we could do that before or after Debconf too.)

we can try that, sure, but I don't want to be the only one sitting 
there. Is that really needed?

Matthias

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

OpenJDK 21 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2024-07-11 11:00 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 21 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@qvest-digital.com> - 2024-07-11 15:30 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 21 tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2024-07-12 06:00 +0200
    Re: OpenJDK 21 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2024-07-12 07:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJDK 21 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2024-07-12 18:50 +0200

csiph-web