Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12784
| From | Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@qvest-digital.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJDK 21 |
| Date | 2024-07-11 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IZ21X-1nf3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IYXOF-1kuC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024, Matthias Klose wrote:
> We will have to keep m68k as pointing to 17 for now.
What, other than the test dependencies, is missing for m68k?
I uploaded a t64-installable hacked 20 so we can bootstrap 21.
Maybe there are some patches that need updating?
Could you maybe do something like:
ifeq (,$(filter ${distrel},wheezy jessie stretch buster bullseye bookworm precise trusty xenial bionic focal jammy mantic noble oracular))
# Debian testing/sid
ifneq (,$(filter ${DEB_HOST_ARCH},m68k sh4))
# xfwm4 B-D for testing not available
with_check = disabled running check on ${distrel}/${DEB_HOST_ARCH}
endif
nocheck_profile = ${NULL} [!m68k !sh4] <!nocheck>
endif
The qemu-user buildds for these two architectures set nocheck
anyway currently still, so this won’t be a regression in practice.
xfwm4 has very heavy dependencies including cyclic. Are the tests
tied to it or would say twm or evilwm suffice? (I normally would
recommend icewm, but it’s got a good part of the same too-heavy
dependencies.)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Infrastrukturexperte • Qvest Digital AG
Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • https://www.qvest-digital.com/
Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
HRB AG Bonn 18196 • USt-ID (VAT): DE274355441
Vorstand: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
Vorsitzender Aufsichtsrat: Peter Nöthen
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OpenJDK 21 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2024-07-11 11:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 21 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@qvest-digital.com> - 2024-07-11 15:30 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 21 tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2024-07-12 06:00 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 21 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2024-07-12 07:20 +0200
Re: OpenJDK 21 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2024-07-12 18:50 +0200
csiph-web