Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12569

Re: Bazel Removal from Debian

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: Bazel Removal from Debian
Date	Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:40:02 +0100
Message-ID	<G1BYe-7u54-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<G0Ugx-72nU-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Tue Feb 21 14:38:48 2023
Old-Return-Path	<hans@at.or.at>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.881 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .at. - helo: .wout2-smtp.messagingengine. - helo-domain: .messagingengine.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Me-Sender	<xms:Xtf0Yzv540Sbb71JgfRfmkeEuq7OP9YPlqd_EjE40Q7pZIzTb3kEjw> <xme:Xtf0Y0c8VluaSEGOW06OfhbmhefWRjL48Np_jigLJUX9kv_sQKrNRnyrOzgIkgeuQ 0svayHvWRQRcA>
X-Me-Received	<xmr:Xtf0Y2zMs3g5UfQdBC9qTRXaLHmFbLlP3FrZr3KTw0DU3eQ1e3x-6CaGLN2BVZfF8Ao_0xNROGhYKZZNHFaxiQ>
X-Me-Proxy-Cause	gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudejjedgieehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffggfuvfevfhfhohgjtgfgsehtjeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghn shdqvehhrhhishhtohhphhcuufhtvghinhgvrhcuoehhrghnshesrghtrdhorhdrrghtqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetteffgeeigfetudekvdeujefglefhkedtjeetkeeuhfeu uddtudeuudehjefhhfenucffohhmrghinhepuggvsghirghnrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhssegrthdrohhr rdgrth
X-Me-Proxy	<xmx:X9f0YyN-qk4S7lfZgI26ntwkRPKjS2uasSF5y4EKZRGrUF6U1742zw> <xmx:X9f0Yz_rcooeMdmy0SSu1-MFPlIww3ZYgOyLRIFdiTCguNduy-zoDA> <xmx:X9f0YyVgQzNP-V8UCgT0FIezQ6d7_qK1Ym3spMdTTcSN4x9_1zKofg> <xmx:X9f0Y1KB0hZNrleA4JTvMLYLqSc73rqEcs83ibtg-kF6KD5u-7wRfQ>
Feedback-ID	i264a41e9:Fastmail
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Language	en-US
Organization	@\|\|@
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23223
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/cd29859e-57c2-6326-0472-5044e736499c@at.or.at
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	32
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Debian Bazel Packaging Team <bazel-team@lists.launchpad.net>
X-Original-Date	Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:38:14 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<cd29859e-57c2-6326-0472-5044e736499c@at.or.at>
X-Original-References	<2FA11FED-1D3B-49A9-BA6E-F77AB13E0C62@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12569

Show key headers only | View raw

If the test passes regularly, and just sometimes fails under the same 
conditions, I would consider disabling it in autopkgtest rather than have it not 
make it into bookworm.  The perfect is the enemy of the good.

.hc

Olek Wojnar:
> Fellow Bazel contributors (and Java Team members),
> 
> I've discussed this with a few of you but I want this to go to the widest possible audience right now. We still have no idea why Bazel Java tests are failing [1] and it seems to indicate an actual problem with Bazel, as opposed to just a flaky test. (It would be nice if I'm wrong about that) To save people a click, the failing error is:
> Unrecognized VM option 'UseParallelOldGC'
> (Which has been patched out of the code [2] so I have no idea where it's coming from)
> 
> So, if we cannot fix this, I'll have to remove Bazel from Debian testing before the bookworm release. Meaning Bazel will NOT be in the next stable Debian release.
> 
> 1 March 2023 is the last day to make an upload that will definitely make it in before the Hard Freeze.
> 
> So, I'm asking all interested people to please please take a look and see if you can figure out how to fix either the tests or the suspected underlying issue.
> 
> Pull Requests from your own branch in the bazel-bootstrap repository [3] are preferred but I'll take patches or even "you should look at line xxx in this one source file."
> 
> Please reply to this thread with any ideas or suggestions. Hopefully with all our eyes on this we can make this really frustrating bug a bit more shallow.
> 
> Thanks in advance!!
> 
> -Olek
> 
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/jobs/3862692
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/blob/master/debian/patches/fix_JDK-16_test_failures.patch
> [3] https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-02-19 17:00 +0100
  Re: Bazel Removal from Debian Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-21 15:40 +0100
    Re: [Bazel-team] Bazel Removal from Debian Yun Peng <pcloudy@google.com> - 2023-02-21 16:30 +0100
    Re: Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-02-21 16:30 +0100
      Re: Bazel Removal from Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-21 17:10 +0100
    Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2023-02-22 06:00 +0100
    Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-02-22 23:10 +0100
      RE: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-23 12:50 +0100
        Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-23 13:20 +0100
        RE: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-03-05 17:00 +0100

csiph-web