Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12570
| From | Yun Peng <pcloudy@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: [Bazel-team] Bazel Removal from Debian |
| Date | 2023-02-21 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <G1CKB-7uBj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <G0Ugx-72nU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <G1BYe-7u54-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G1CKB-7uBj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
My feeling is that this problem is probably fixed in a newer Bazel version, so it could be automatically solved if we can package Bazel 5 or 6, but of course, that's not trivial work. On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 4:04 PM Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> wrote: > Hi hc, > > Thanks for helping to start the conversation! > > > On February 21, 2023 2:38:14 PM UTC, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> > wrote: > > > >If the test passes regularly, and just sometimes fails under the same > conditions, I would consider disabling it in autopkgtest rather than have > it not make it into bookworm. The perfect is the enemy of the good. > > Unfortunately, the test fails pretty regularly now. This behavior started > when we moved to OpenJDK17. That makes sense since 'UseParallelOldGC' was > valid prior to that. > > I *have* temporarily disabled the Java tests [1]. As you said, to not hold > back the package due to a possibly flaky test. But my concern is that this > is actually an issue with how Bazel uses Java rather than a flaky test. > Again, I'd be happy to be wrong about that. :) > > -Olek > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel-bootstrap/-/commit/1c90621d7b9b5d44d01b91dabb04645a20273ca8 > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bazel-team > Post to : bazel-team@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~bazel-team > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-02-19 17:00 +0100
Re: Bazel Removal from Debian Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2023-02-21 15:40 +0100
Re: [Bazel-team] Bazel Removal from Debian Yun Peng <pcloudy@google.com> - 2023-02-21 16:30 +0100
Re: Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-02-21 16:30 +0100
Re: Bazel Removal from Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-21 17:10 +0100
Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2023-02-22 06:00 +0100
Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-02-22 23:10 +0100
RE: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-02-23 12:50 +0100
Re: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2023-02-23 13:20 +0100
RE: reply: Bazel Removal from Debian Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2023-03-05 17:00 +0100
csiph-web