Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12263
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 |
| Date | Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:40:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CFXzj-5Wd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CFTm1-3va-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jul 28 19:36:35 2021 |
| Old-Return-Path | <npatra974@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RERE=1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-pj1-f49.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOAM533MKLRe1lVEQExxdXZ1lqc3fCwxaZ1SaCuQir6nxJpq1OFhOW8M fzRjw0O7ZTbiGF7NRtJS2LT31DDTK1zmqMrd |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | ABdhPJw218Ug2XFKTrUKTG/9zf6AJlF2H2gfKzXlLe3CpWP3YnV7fD3Me8XoPAl8SwDB1xXKHoC1yg== |
| X-Received | by 2002:a17:903:32cf:b029:12b:8b8b:3a5 with SMTP id i15-20020a17090332cfb029012b8b8b03a5mr1118522plr.48.1627500976729; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:36:16 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+8WltQhndTbazsgH" |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22892 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YQGxq3TY64TDy3P1@debian |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 103 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 29 Jul 2021 01:06:11 +0530 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <YQGxq3TY64TDy3P1@debian> |
| X-Original-References | <20210728150803.qfw5los2idiy24ld@lark> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:12263 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:41:46AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Hi Peymaneh, >> >> Le 2021-07-27 10:09, Peymaneh Nejad a écrit : >> >> > Is it intended or wished for that additional runtimes other than Java >> > are packaged in seperate source packages >> >> Yes it is, for several reasons: >> - The Java Team doesn't have the time and skills to maintain properly a >> multi-language package like ANTLR. The Java part is sufficiently complex on >> its own, we'd rather not have to care about the other languages. >> - Different language ecosystems often require distinct and slightly >> incompatible versions of ANTLR. >> - Handling several languages in the same package makes upgrades and >> regression testing much more difficult. >> - ANTLR is a core package of the Java ecosystems, including more languages >> increases the dependency tree of the Java packages and makes the >> bootstrapping harder. >> >> So it's preferable to have a clear separation of responsability with >> different source packages, each language team having the freedom to maintain >> its version as needed without impacting the others. > I don't disagree with Emmanuel's statements about the importance of > ANTLR and why it is helpful to maintain separation. However, I don't > think introducing a separate source package each language ecosystem is > necessarily best for Debian. > It causes additional work for the Security team when in the event there > vulnerabilities. It potentially confuses users (and Debian developers) > by creating a distinction that does not exist upstream. It also means > that we will release with different versions of ANTLR for different > languages, which feels very "non-distro" to me. (What happens if the > version of the ANTLR parser for language X is subtly incompatible with > language Y, and a user runs a system on Debian that requires both > bindings?) Chiming in here, since it was originally me who asked Peymaneh to contact this list, and I was sponsoring the same. I was initially of the same opinion that it should be unified into a single source package, but ebourg's points against doing that are pretty strong too. While I do not disagree w/ tony on this, but there already exist antlr4-cpp-runtime[1] and python3-antlr4[2] packaged separately, and indeed, they seem to have different versions than the Java antlr4 we have -- 4.9 and 4.9.1 respectively as opposed to 4.7.2 in the java antlr4 package IMO, this is making it "non-distro" already. There are also a bunch of other runtimes in other languages which might as well need packaging at some point in time Then, we have a few options: 1) Talk to the maintainers of cpp-runtime and python3-antlr to unify sources with the original antlr4 source package And this can be a very time consuming task there, since fundamentally the versions differ quite a bit, and fixing it will take time 2) Do "$something-else" for all these packages to stay in sync - again, probably bumping versions only when needed. With this approach, I do not see a problem in introducing a Go runtime source package there Thoughts? [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/antlr4-cpp-runtime [2]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-antlr4 Nilesh
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Peymaneh Nejad <p.nejad@posteo.de> - 2021-07-27 10:10 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-07-27 17:10 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2021-07-27 18:10 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-07-28 10:10 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Peymaneh Nejad <p.nejad@posteo.de> - 2021-07-28 11:20 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2021-07-28 17:10 +0200
Re: Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2021-07-28 21:40 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2021-07-28 21:50 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2021-07-29 09:10 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Olek Wojnar <olek@debian.org> - 2021-07-29 16:20 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2021-07-29 21:50 +0200
antlr 4.10 released [Was: Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4] Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2022-04-13 10:40 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-07-30 02:40 +0200
Re: packaging Go runtime for ANTLR4 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2021-07-30 05:50 +0200
csiph-web