Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12021

Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help?

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2020-12-23 16 h 44, Markus Koschany wrote:
> If nobody steps forward to maintain jruby, I am more in favor of making r-deps
> less dependent on jruby. I am quite sure in most cases support for jruby is
> optional but not essential.

FWIW, I've started looking at updating jruby. I've touched 2 deps
already (backport9 and jnr-constants) and zigo refreshed all the patches
for the latest version [1].

I won't promise anything, but it's not like I can make jruby less usable
than it currently is :)

[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/zigo/jruby

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 22:20 +0100
  Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 22:50 +0100
    Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 23:00 +0100
    Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 23:30 +0100
      Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2020-12-24 00:50 +0100
        Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2020-12-24 01:00 +0100
    Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-12-30 20:20 +0100

csiph-web