Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #12002

jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help?

From Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help?
Date 2020-12-23 22:20 +0100
Message-ID <BpjI5-7S1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello!

While working on a Clojure package that depends on jruby, I noticed it's
in pretty bad shape:

1. it FTBFS (#959600)

2. it has a bunch of CVEs (#972230)

3. it doesn't run without declaring a specific env var (#977979)

4. it loads gems from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby and it probably should
not for compatibility reasons (#977981)

5. it should probably be updated to the latest upstream version, as it
targets ruby 2.3, which is kinda old and has no security support [1]
(#895837)

Being a key package, it hasn't been removed from testing, so people
might have not noticed those issues.

Adrian Bunk says a large part of the Java ecosystem seems to
transitively depend on jruby, so I guess all those things are Bad™.

Is there someone that could take a look at this package? It's really out
of my field of expertise and I don't think I'll be able to help :S

PS: I'm not currently subscribed to this list, so please keep me in CC.

[1]:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/06/20/support-of-ruby-2-2-has-ended/

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 22:20 +0100
  Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 22:50 +0100
    Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 23:00 +0100
    Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-12-23 23:30 +0100
      Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2020-12-24 00:50 +0100
        Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2020-12-24 01:00 +0100
    Re: jruby in sid is pretty broken and is a key package. Help? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-12-30 20:20 +0100

csiph-web