Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.maint.hams > #11215

Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.2

From Federico Grau <donfede@casagrau.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.hams
Subject Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.2
Date 2026-03-25 01:40 +0100
Message-ID <MCkrT-a434-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <MyXBw-7KEq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <MzqDv-84YQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MzqDv-84YQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MC7bj-9UVt-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:20:06AM +0100, Andrew Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 1:30 AM Federico Grau <donfede@casagrau.org> wrote:
> > Pardon the sloppy efforts here, I'll aim to improve.
> 
> No worries. We all learnt that from our mistakes. Please remember to
> do merge request next time then.
> 
> I quickly check the commit history. I saw you have a commit to updated
> debian/changelog earlier than commits. And debian/changelog didn't
> included your later commits for refresh exist patch for 0.19.2-1
> release. Is this something you intend to not included the later
> commits and hold for future 0.19.2-2 release?
> 

Thanks for the review Andrew --

We may be getting too deep into transaction details with the Git commits.

The d/changelog commit (35edc1f) I created was meant to represent the work I
completed that weekend for this update to `pat' v0.19.2 .  It happens I
committed the d/patches a few minutes after the d/changelog commit.  The
d/patches I updated only include the new upstream version in man pages and
upstream changelog...


I have now updated d/changelog for release 0.19.2-2, mentioning the minor
d/patches edits.  Note: given this minor change with no questions on my part,
I did not create a MR for this effort.

Hopefully we can get this release of pat 0.19.2 into unstable.



Looking ahead, I see pat was recently "Marked for autoremoval on 25 April due
to golang-github-howeyc-gopass: #1130525".  I will submit a bug/issue upstream
noting this risk, but ideally pat can remain in debian while upstream adapts.


Regards,
donfede

Fede Grau


Back to linux.debian.maint.hams | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

seeking review of pat 0.19.2 Federico Grau <donfede@casagrau.org> - 2026-03-15 18:40 +0100
  Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.2 Federico Grau <donfede@casagrau.org> - 2026-03-17 01:40 +0100
    Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.2 Andrew Lee <ajqlee@debian.org> - 2026-03-24 11:30 +0100
      Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.2 Federico Grau <donfede@casagrau.org> - 2026-03-25 01:40 +0100
        Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.2 Andrew Lee <ajqlee@debian.org> - 2026-03-25 10:10 +0100

csiph-web