Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.misc.discuss > #7861

Re: modified BSD-4-clause and GPL

From ole-usenet-spam@gmx.net (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr)
Newsgroups gnu.misc.discuss
Subject Re: modified BSD-4-clause and GPL
Date 2015-06-14 13:20 +0200
Message-ID <878ubmbkou.fsf@gmx.net> (permalink)
References <ytzd213lq7a.fsf@news.ole.ath.cx> <87pp4z70qm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

Show all headers | View raw


Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr:
>
>> Question here: is the license of mpfit compatible to GPL?
>
> Which GPL version?

2+

> Version 3 covers something like this in an explicit compatibility
> enhancement:
>
>     b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or
>     author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal
>     Notices displayed by works containing it; or

This is a bit different: the license does require preservation of an
existing notice, but adding an explicite acknowledgement somewhere else
(namely in the documentation or wherever usual acknowledgments are put).

> But you'll have to ask the licensor of the GPL code you're trying to
> link with.  Interpretations vary, and the license text goes only so
> far to avoid disputes.

This is complicated/impossible. The code links to other GPL code
(f.e. readline), and in priciple one would need to ask the whole chain
to get permission.

Ole

Back to gnu.misc.discuss | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: modified BSD-4-clause and GPL ole-usenet-spam@gmx.net (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) - 2015-06-14 13:20 +0200

csiph-web