Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.misc.discuss > #7861
| From | ole-usenet-spam@gmx.net (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.misc.discuss |
| Subject | Re: modified BSD-4-clause and GPL |
| Date | 2015-06-14 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <878ubmbkou.fsf@gmx.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ytzd213lq7a.fsf@news.ole.ath.cx> <87pp4z70qm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> |
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes: > * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr: > >> Question here: is the license of mpfit compatible to GPL? > > Which GPL version? 2+ > Version 3 covers something like this in an explicit compatibility > enhancement: > > b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or > author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal > Notices displayed by works containing it; or This is a bit different: the license does require preservation of an existing notice, but adding an explicite acknowledgement somewhere else (namely in the documentation or wherever usual acknowledgments are put). > But you'll have to ask the licensor of the GPL code you're trying to > link with. Interpretations vary, and the license text goes only so > far to avoid disputes. This is complicated/impossible. The code links to other GPL code (f.e. readline), and in priciple one would need to ask the whole chain to get permission. Ole
Back to gnu.misc.discuss | Next | Find similar
Re: modified BSD-4-clause and GPL ole-usenet-spam@gmx.net (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) - 2015-06-14 13:20 +0200
csiph-web