Re: Hi all, I have a question: is Linux modules (.ko) loading directly on Hurd (with the new server-translator like "linux-modules") better than load DDE drivers?

From	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Newsgroups	gnu.hurd.help
Subject	Re: Hi all, I have a question: is Linux modules (.ko) loading directly on Hurd (with the new server-translator like "linux-modules") better than load DDE drivers?
Date	2015-11-28 11:08 +0100
Message-ID	<mailman.861.1448705320.31583.help-hurd@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<56591F1A.2060903@riseup.net>

Show all headers | View raw

coadde, on Sat 28 Nov 2015 03:27:22 +0000, wrote:
> Hi all, I have a question: is Linux modules (.ko) loading directly on
> Hurd (with the new server-translator like "linux-modules") better than
> load DDE drivers?

Do you mean implementing a new linux-modules translator? DDE is meant
for that, I don't see why implementing something else.

Samuel

Back to gnu.hurd.help | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Hi all, I have a question: is Linux modules (.ko) loading directly on Hurd (with the new server-translator like "linux-modules") better than load DDE drivers? Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> - 2015-11-28 11:08 +0100

csiph-web