Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.groff.bug > #1572 > unrolled thread

Re: FAMILY-dependent apostrophe behaviour with -mom

Started byMarc Simpson <marc@0branch.com>
First post2019-12-02 11:26 -0800
Last post2019-12-02 11:26 -0800
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.groff.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: FAMILY-dependent apostrophe behaviour with -mom Marc Simpson <marc@0branch.com> - 2019-12-02 11:26 -0800

#1572 — Re: FAMILY-dependent apostrophe behaviour with -mom

FromMarc Simpson <marc@0branch.com>
Date2019-12-02 11:26 -0800
SubjectRe: FAMILY-dependent apostrophe behaviour with -mom
Message-ID<mailman.156.1575314779.1979.bug-groff@gnu.org>
Hi Deri,

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:50 AM Deri <deri@chuzzlewit.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> If you can provide some examples, I would like to look into this difference.

Sure: I've just put a Fossil repo up at

  http://fossil.0branch.com/apostrophe-bug

You can download trunk here:

  http://fossil.0branch.com/apostrophe-bug/tarball/trunk/apostrophe-bug.tar.gz

or clone, browse online as you see fit.

I've also included the fonts in original TTF, and as converted by
Peter's Schaffter's script. Hopefully this is considered fair use for
debugging purposes.

Once you have a copy and have the fonts installed, just type 'make' to
produce four PDFs. You should be able to observe that two of them
(those produced with `groff -Tpdf' and `pdfmom') exhibit the
apostrophe issue, while the other two don't.

Thanks for taking a look;
Best,
Marc

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.groff.bug


csiph-web