Re: FAMILY-dependent apostrophe behaviour with -mom

From	Marc Simpson <marc@0branch.com>
Newsgroups	gnu.groff.bug
Subject	Re: FAMILY-dependent apostrophe behaviour with -mom
Date	2019-12-02 11:26 -0800
Message-ID	<mailman.156.1575314779.1979.bug-groff@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<CAMbwm8_6uVsLCqCSFM232TmTNCnDtvXnrDb+cyvtqMC_wq2uuA@mail.gmail.com> <CADUdNdJdnJtvP9=-1WfuSPN1yXSQoZy6AsRfLso-vemk0M-54g@mail.gmail.com> <CAMbwm8-mek-jwsC9d-+bJP4MhFvF_9dfd_L=jQM_36h1foo+wg@mail.gmail.com> <2403810.z0MjTcnAeh@pip> <CAMbwm88tHJJFkTiWArtpXVqDVZ1EMMxZud3YpDasScQzyqVBPQ@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Deri,

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:50 AM Deri <deri@chuzzlewit.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> If you can provide some examples, I would like to look into this difference.

Sure: I've just put a Fossil repo up at

  http://fossil.0branch.com/apostrophe-bug

You can download trunk here:

  http://fossil.0branch.com/apostrophe-bug/tarball/trunk/apostrophe-bug.tar.gz

or clone, browse online as you see fit.

I've also included the fonts in original TTF, and as converted by
Peter's Schaffter's script. Hopefully this is considered fair use for
debugging purposes.

Once you have a copy and have the fonts installed, just type 'make' to
produce four PDFs. You should be able to observe that two of them
(those produced with `groff -Tpdf' and `pdfmom') exhibit the
apostrophe issue, while the other two don't.

Thanks for taking a look;
Best,
Marc

Back to gnu.groff.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: FAMILY-dependent apostrophe behaviour with -mom Marc Simpson <marc@0branch.com> - 2019-12-02 11:26 -0800

csiph-web