Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15459 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-10-02 10:53 -0400 |
| Last post | 2019-10-02 10:53 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence intheshell arithmetic expression? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-10-02 10:53 -0400
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-10-02 10:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence intheshell arithmetic expression? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.769.1570028007.2651.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 10/2/19 10:50 AM, hkadeveloper wrote: > Yes. I understand what you are saying. I mean isn’t it a little > inconsistent about the comment, the macro name(EXP_HIGHEST) and the macro > value(expcomma)? I know what it means. ;-) It's just the one you call first to start the recursive descent. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web