Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence intheshell arithmetic expression?

From	Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence intheshell arithmetic expression?
Date	2019-10-02 10:53 -0400
Message-ID	<mailman.769.1570028007.2651.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<tencent_D677133F9DB7D6B3D6115ADB@qq.com> <c3d0fbb6-6790-47c7-db17-4c4af7339c37@case.edu>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/2/19 10:50 AM, hkadeveloper wrote:
> Yes. I understand what you are saying. I mean isn’t it a little
> inconsistent about the comment, the macro name(EXP_HIGHEST) and the macro
> value(expcomma)?

I know what it means. ;-)

It's just the one you call first to start the recursive descent.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: shouldn't it the comma operator has the lowerest precedence intheshell arithmetic expression? Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2019-10-02 10:53 -0400

csiph-web