Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14158 > unrolled thread

Why does bash bundles readline instead of use a shared one?

Started by"Garreau\, Alexandre" <galex-713@galex-713.eu>
First post2018-05-28 18:27 +0200
Last post2018-05-28 18:27 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug


Contents

  Why does bash bundles readline instead of use a shared one? "Garreau\, Alexandre" <galex-713@galex-713.eu> - 2018-05-28 18:27 +0200

#14158 — Why does bash bundles readline instead of use a shared one?

From"Garreau\, Alexandre" <galex-713@galex-713.eu>
Date2018-05-28 18:27 +0200
SubjectWhy does bash bundles readline instead of use a shared one?
Message-ID<mailman.651.1527524871.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org>
Hi,

Today, searching in my distribution (debian) for which packages depended
on readline, I learnt that bash didn’t link with readline, but bundled
its own version present in its sources tree.

Why so? is it to gain performance? is the memory waste minimal or even
negative due to some optimization? is it because distributions may
find difficult to embed an instance of a recent-enough readline? doesn’t
this add complexity to manage synchronization between bash readline and
upstream one? I’m curious about this…

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web