Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14158

Why does bash bundles readline instead of use a shared one?

From "Garreau\, Alexandre" <galex-713@galex-713.eu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Why does bash bundles readline instead of use a shared one?
Date 2018-05-28 18:27 +0200
Message-ID <mailman.651.1527524871.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

Today, searching in my distribution (debian) for which packages depended
on readline, I learnt that bash didn’t link with readline, but bundled
its own version present in its sources tree.

Why so? is it to gain performance? is the memory waste minimal or even
negative due to some optimization? is it because distributions may
find difficult to embed an instance of a recent-enough readline? doesn’t
this add complexity to manage synchronization between bash readline and
upstream one? I’m curious about this…

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why does bash bundles readline instead of use a shared one? "Garreau\, Alexandre" <galex-713@galex-713.eu> - 2018-05-28 18:27 +0200

csiph-web