Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16530

Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters

From Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters
Date 2020-07-03 17:39 -0400
Message-ID <mailman.908.1593812399.2574.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <b1c19d38-64c0-f1ae-d08a-1ada435a0022@gmail.com> <506AA493-0D79-4A9A-A53E-279FDA72CED5@larryv.me>

Show all headers | View raw


> On Jul 3, 2020, at 2:00 PM, Chris Elvidge <celvidge001@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> However 'N=0; echo $((!$N))' gives an error at the bash prompt.
> 'echo $[!$N]' echo's 1 as expected.
> 
> My question - is $[...] actually obsolete?

It might tell you something that $[...] is not even mentioned in
the man page for bash 3.2.57, which is decidedly not the current
version.

> If so, what should I use at the bash prompt to get the same effect?


I expect that the error you encountered was caused by !$ expanding
to the last word of the previous command and making the contents
of $((...)) an invalid arithmetic expression. This didn't affect
your scripts because history expansion is not enabled in non-interactive
shells by default.

Try inserting a space.

	$ N=0; printf %s\\n "$((! $N))"
	1

You can even drop the $.

	$ N=0; printf %s\\n "$((! N))"
	1

vq

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> - 2020-07-03 17:39 -0400

csiph-web