Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?

Path	csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From	Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?
Date	Fri, 28 Dec 2018 08:07:17 -0500
Lines	15
Approved	bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID	<mailman.6463.1546003321.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<CABrM6wmrn2gi8_HgmRg67B5nsgGNFRn8Bn-r20MvC-_2LJHZ0g@mail.gmail.com> <5dac2cf2-2fac-0fd1-058f-6a84a3271738@case.edu> <abd86dbc-f6e2-62bd-e9dc-f959e2dbff9f@inlv.org> <CABrM6wkGwVbPdrXTetVsFCiwDPg5JnK4KRh49WqACsKhrrMMdA@mail.gmail.com> <20181228013623.mersdxbzy64dpldp@crack.deadbeast.net> <CABrM6w=2zrjmV24VAgzioAu2iNcyuf3tsi--cfvkCH6MJ7feRA@mail.gmail.com> <20181228015710.tzzbejk36fsgr5wb@crack.deadbeast.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host	lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace	usenet.stanford.edu 1546003321 3518 208.118.235.17 (28 Dec 2018 13:22:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	action@cs.stanford.edu
To	bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to	bug-bash@gnu.org
Mail-Followup-To	bug-bash@gnu.org
Content-Disposition	inline
In-Reply-To	<20181228015710.tzzbejk36fsgr5wb@crack.deadbeast.net>
User-Agent	NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-detected-operating-system	by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From	139.137.100.1
X-BeenThere	bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.21
Precedence	list
List-Id	Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post	<mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help	<mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref	csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14989

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 08:57:12PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> What is it you're trying to achieve?  State your goal in terms that are
> "SMART":
> 
> (S)pecific
> (M)easurable
> (A)ttainable
> (R)easonable
> (T)imely

For the record, I tried for approximately two years to get Peng Yu
to state his goals, in a multitude of bug-bash and help-bash threads.
I tried the carrot, and I tried the stick.  Not ONCE did he ever do so.
I hope you have better luck than I did, but I wouldn't count on it.

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-12-28 08:07 -0500

csiph-web