Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14990
| From | Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? |
| Date | 2018-12-28 07:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6465.1546004758.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <20181228013623.mersdxbzy64dpldp@crack.deadbeast.net> <CABrM6w=2zrjmV24VAgzioAu2iNcyuf3tsi--cfvkCH6MJ7feRA@mail.gmail.com> <20181228015710.tzzbejk36fsgr5wb@crack.deadbeast.net> <CABrM6wkfvTzY5UBMDz_kNr=imV_KpSsFF6o8fV5RLrKMYrPKgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOSMAut1wQTvKhT4ECsC1tbPFTP_NfH8VrgO2OrOeGqAYr+L6g@mail.gmail.com> |
> A profiler is exactly what you need here. You should profile your > script and understand the stuff that actually matters for your goals. > Otherwise you're just chasing unimportant things. Again, my goal is not to profile a specific bash script. The goal is to see what features make bash only fit into a shell language but cannot make into other domains that other languages (e.g. python) are popular at. -- Regards, Peng
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 07:34 -0600
csiph-web