Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14500

Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments.

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments.
Date Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:11:01 -0400
Lines 36
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.5146.1534349515.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAFra36j=UuqHv2Spp26ebAW0dRW+KsgNS21hZJrwuku9QUayWw@mail.gmail.com> <20180814123113518879862@bob.proulx.com> <CAFra36i8APbrP77S-v2wQgUp17bOprQtFqaYHHKqduRZuORVTA@mail.gmail.com> <20180815011219279040096@bob.proulx.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1534349516 16005 208.118.235.17 (15 Aug 2018 16:11:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com>, bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SofwKbT+3mfhMy/jJm/RqCCq6jO9W36I94odjlcYNHk=; b=fNp4T77Yelt6GPBs+J1oLCHuA34hZ7mGuNZA2aYAVs13DantaVZ5mAzmdDYjsTb2Vg ePY5y+hiXdUMAxGgF3d/uKMI/LfsWW3AW5KgFOMZ8nTKA69JNbIBxYa2J58TPLQ9zf9T UqsJslkxCxtZQblcATjcVlqJ3b4w0wSEBnNiiv85S1OJKGhonlm/WCJ6rIrImtK/hjZt 6Ii7FAjJOVo32qbpxmMDlaVV9FDCqaezAdcJP4VrxCLvt4bp4gw6DdvToA6lJ6iXZ/Av awyfWPo/9pw4Jr9S32diN7DcT3VdG77nfYwccaIyKmmXxSatWMR/9n4opwMLheI5v7Cq MbTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=SofwKbT+3mfhMy/jJm/RqCCq6jO9W36I94odjlcYNHk=; b=PGQCoW4HKaIC+P0mO5YbB4FMtnCQkSjMwrHLjkcP0rHE1MNmYywfk+at5sCyYQ/r7x ejRDls4jxelNZGTJqNRd/PhDfocsUg6dMMMCpXexnQiPni8Q7jEheoUi/WFoV6Ur3Hi7 LNhkS+mKa1jcF8DyXmMfb55Ligh4gf8xh9vdgAwAhICsi0G+0DjFTMGAzxvSNElfs6ly EOItn8/wZvur+HaapdTTMN16IDpuV3ZuTlkglsOb0pv0yDDEe/gc2iI/qgRr7o05ZD+n ssBAPCKMzbw/cj2FCW71OauTLvI9tahQM+z7bDGbVwD3iZ1XF3QIKTPObKpb90gvw2l3 iIrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State AOUpUlE9LngLuW+g1Z/jtlz4KX3fgQq2sjnckhLGxs6LMfzmaqhXzzIi 8Z9h3LtXBMlEHouo/Y/VYbuZzn829Vt0+eV4LdE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source AA+uWPxZvjeCPgl5dSOxZzVQhntgCzQRT+1WR8w/UuBSB8YWPrCcP+gQ7Jy6QL8P4fsynYQnFeebn5EsttEDjIO19pQ=
X-Received by 2002:aca:3a03:: with SMTP id h3-v6mr26678424oia.270.1534349462153; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <20180815011219279040096@bob.proulx.com>
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized.
X-Received-From 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235
X-Content-Filtered-By Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14500

Show key headers only | View raw


2018-08-15 3:36 GMT-04:00 Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>:

> Bize Ma wrote:
>


> I still believe that to be true.


You are entitled to have an opinion, even if incorrect.


> Since you haven't shared what the
> actual task is there is no way for us to propose any counter example
> improvements.  So "almost" is as far as I can go.  Instead should I
> say 99.44% of the time?  Since I have never come across a counter
> example yet?
>

Give it time.


> > Take a look at the Stéphane Chazelas example to convince yourself.
>
> Nothing Stéphane said changed my statement at all.
>

How do you process a «list of files» without the «list of files» ?


> It does look like bash can be more efficient with argument handling.
> Since, for example, dash does it.
>

That is true.

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments. Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 12:11 -0400

csiph-web