Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14500
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments. |
| Date | Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:11:01 -0400 |
| Lines | 36 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5146.1534349515.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAFra36j=UuqHv2Spp26ebAW0dRW+KsgNS21hZJrwuku9QUayWw@mail.gmail.com> <20180814123113518879862@bob.proulx.com> <CAFra36i8APbrP77S-v2wQgUp17bOprQtFqaYHHKqduRZuORVTA@mail.gmail.com> <20180815011219279040096@bob.proulx.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1534349516 16005 208.118.235.17 (15 Aug 2018 16:11:56 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com>, bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SofwKbT+3mfhMy/jJm/RqCCq6jO9W36I94odjlcYNHk=; b=fNp4T77Yelt6GPBs+J1oLCHuA34hZ7mGuNZA2aYAVs13DantaVZ5mAzmdDYjsTb2Vg ePY5y+hiXdUMAxGgF3d/uKMI/LfsWW3AW5KgFOMZ8nTKA69JNbIBxYa2J58TPLQ9zf9T UqsJslkxCxtZQblcATjcVlqJ3b4w0wSEBnNiiv85S1OJKGhonlm/WCJ6rIrImtK/hjZt 6Ii7FAjJOVo32qbpxmMDlaVV9FDCqaezAdcJP4VrxCLvt4bp4gw6DdvToA6lJ6iXZ/Av awyfWPo/9pw4Jr9S32diN7DcT3VdG77nfYwccaIyKmmXxSatWMR/9n4opwMLheI5v7Cq MbTw== |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=SofwKbT+3mfhMy/jJm/RqCCq6jO9W36I94odjlcYNHk=; b=PGQCoW4HKaIC+P0mO5YbB4FMtnCQkSjMwrHLjkcP0rHE1MNmYywfk+at5sCyYQ/r7x ejRDls4jxelNZGTJqNRd/PhDfocsUg6dMMMCpXexnQiPni8Q7jEheoUi/WFoV6Ur3Hi7 LNhkS+mKa1jcF8DyXmMfb55Ligh4gf8xh9vdgAwAhICsi0G+0DjFTMGAzxvSNElfs6ly EOItn8/wZvur+HaapdTTMN16IDpuV3ZuTlkglsOb0pv0yDDEe/gc2iI/qgRr7o05ZD+n ssBAPCKMzbw/cj2FCW71OauTLvI9tahQM+z7bDGbVwD3iZ1XF3QIKTPObKpb90gvw2l3 iIrQ== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOUpUlE9LngLuW+g1Z/jtlz4KX3fgQq2sjnckhLGxs6LMfzmaqhXzzIi 8Z9h3LtXBMlEHouo/Y/VYbuZzn829Vt0+eV4LdE= |
| X-Google-Smtp-Source | AA+uWPxZvjeCPgl5dSOxZzVQhntgCzQRT+1WR8w/UuBSB8YWPrCcP+gQ7Jy6QL8P4fsynYQnFeebn5EsttEDjIO19pQ= |
| X-Received | by 2002:aca:3a03:: with SMTP id h3-v6mr26678424oia.270.1534349462153; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <20180815011219279040096@bob.proulx.com> |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. |
| X-Received-From | 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235 |
| X-Content-Filtered-By | Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.21 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14500 |
Show key headers only | View raw
2018-08-15 3:36 GMT-04:00 Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>: > Bize Ma wrote: > > I still believe that to be true. You are entitled to have an opinion, even if incorrect. > Since you haven't shared what the > actual task is there is no way for us to propose any counter example > improvements. So "almost" is as far as I can go. Instead should I > say 99.44% of the time? Since I have never come across a counter > example yet? > Give it time. > > Take a look at the Stéphane Chazelas example to convince yourself. > > Nothing Stéphane said changed my statement at all. > How do you process a «list of files» without the «list of files» ? > It does look like bash can be more efficient with argument handling. > Since, for example, dash does it. > That is true.
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments. Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 12:11 -0400
csiph-web