Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14500 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-15 12:11 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-08-15 12:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments. Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 12:11 -0400
| From | Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 12:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments. |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5146.1534349515.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
2018-08-15 3:36 GMT-04:00 Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>: > Bize Ma wrote: > > I still believe that to be true. You are entitled to have an opinion, even if incorrect. > Since you haven't shared what the > actual task is there is no way for us to propose any counter example > improvements. So "almost" is as far as I can go. Instead should I > say 99.44% of the time? Since I have never come across a counter > example yet? > Give it time. > > Take a look at the Stéphane Chazelas example to convince yourself. > > Nothing Stéphane said changed my statement at all. > How do you process a «list of files» without the «list of files» ? > It does look like bash can be more efficient with argument handling. > Since, for example, dash does it. > That is true.
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web