Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16045
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Vaidas BoQsc <vaidas.boqsc@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? |
| Date | Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:05:58 +0200 |
| Lines | 31 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.477.1585242401.3020.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAB+qc9AAPQbzp92tv-FOR4Kh+2UdZyRwGiPOfNegVqv5UFnU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <C46D87FD-947F-46CA-A03C-68E52E14BF5A@larryv.me> <CAB+qc9DGHtSxD_2cYkDnhzXYR-_C6civArEsfiwfECbWzCxigw@mail.gmail.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1585242401 7074 209.51.188.17 (26 Mar 2020 17:06:41 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| Cc | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| To | Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yuo/siThPMbmmCI7fgK4lDR+YScDPrtA84bm+jGn6JE=; b=kLCzz0+YNM5rZNt5aA4yeY2E7auYfljwWrb38yH1DQL1YLzASWAHvIC5RRy+FBoLen InAg2lZQvl5lO4tPUMqtQn1ZOofGII2TIcghONufmMrofQUUztmeRi1DfTK0nKvItPjb +w+kpe83c95yKwAEXLGD/FdlHzT6UXCpQ8LklCwQF6rOzf7aYDVFxjEY7ptzpPDisOXv cUk8gN6sKKtppYFqZdJCix9kTECpMJoyZyrYCV4W6y/YImkCHvg7teEJ1I5QvVhcTdw5 8e3lOsovagGZFSaMDZoe18Qzh0B8OCgbxUZ7G3HwgdntLLDe5we9V4dkfsEzHNWmj0TB Q8iw== |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yuo/siThPMbmmCI7fgK4lDR+YScDPrtA84bm+jGn6JE=; b=S/f2tEzk+GA1Nt6KfkJUQa/bfVb9MtPP/N3MJLF4xy5Fck5eD5w3TQNtiPaD4QtONV rp29adhECpdeSmyCKrpWX5QzR0i6km0qnroyYSkbWCupR/HhAdS4KygDIElhDF8Fn8zm YKf0LIsOIc8tWXLJYbE0Bss0x195bEqkotNdG769qGqx/zBxVusREOcCRt7qNlQ2bz9i mT4cO7ll5YAaxd/+y9TVkULgRavaZFp+kLLMcTC9bcDMVSmnzKBZ5C96+JSLUUUL3StB 9HccoN94Zewfz2R7jbttKWDJGw3/YU3t2eE+g1zCIA5cmUQNqXjXaIBkx019vIsnQEqL rGEA== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | ANhLgQ341E4nnw7sPThGGIg1p5Khgos23t38YGjdHVXux6UyxS7Gg8YU TEE6tsnpad3qdINjnub/VKk4NDQGg2GTZojz4m4= |
| X-Google-Smtp-Source | ADFU+vsksMTXX+Bu7iwmG3BI91iTiCAEmEBq78kLcgGEQl5BrllDXRCnvv0CcxsRoQdZ4Ftom9hoUGHHCDBDUaXWqko= |
| X-Received | by 2002:a17:906:2cd5:: with SMTP id r21mr8986242ejr.222.1585242395503; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:06:35 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <C46D87FD-947F-46CA-A03C-68E52E14BF5A@larryv.me> |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. |
| X-Received-From | 2a00:1450:4864:20::52a |
| X-Content-Filtered-By | Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <CAB+qc9DGHtSxD_2cYkDnhzXYR-_C6civArEsfiwfECbWzCxigw@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <CAB+qc9AAPQbzp92tv-FOR4Kh+2UdZyRwGiPOfNegVqv5UFnU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <C46D87FD-947F-46CA-A03C-68E52E14BF5A@larryv.me> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16045 |
Show key headers only | View raw
I keep on wondering why these shells can't come up with something better than improving previous shell syntax by little by only providing poor better alternatives. I somehow think there is a need to rethink shells from scratch to make them less mentally demanding and readable in the command prompt and scripts themselves. I really haven't seen anything that I would like to use so far. Neither zsh, tcsh or any other of the more popular ones as far as I remember from the last weeks "personal research". 2020-03-20, pn, 06:11 Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> rašė: > > On Mar 12, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Vaidas BoQsc <vaidas.boqsc@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Are there any plans to have alternative, a more modern C or D like > > syntaxes for IF statements, While loop and the like in Bash? > > > > Would it be better to just make a new shell and command language > > similar to Bash instead of adding these alternatives? > > FWIW, some of zsh's complex commands have alternative forms that > are visually more C-like, although they have some caveats and are > (obviously) not even remotely portable. > > > http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Shell-Grammar.html#Alternate-Forms-For-Complex-Commands > > vq
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? Vaidas BoQsc <vaidas.boqsc@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 19:05 +0200 Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2020-03-26 17:23 +0000
csiph-web