Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16045

Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements?

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Vaidas BoQsc <vaidas.boqsc@gmail.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements?
Date Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:05:58 +0200
Lines 31
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.477.1585242401.3020.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAB+qc9AAPQbzp92tv-FOR4Kh+2UdZyRwGiPOfNegVqv5UFnU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <C46D87FD-947F-46CA-A03C-68E52E14BF5A@larryv.me> <CAB+qc9DGHtSxD_2cYkDnhzXYR-_C6civArEsfiwfECbWzCxigw@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1585242401 7074 209.51.188.17 (26 Mar 2020 17:06:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc bug-bash@gnu.org
To Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yuo/siThPMbmmCI7fgK4lDR+YScDPrtA84bm+jGn6JE=; b=kLCzz0+YNM5rZNt5aA4yeY2E7auYfljwWrb38yH1DQL1YLzASWAHvIC5RRy+FBoLen InAg2lZQvl5lO4tPUMqtQn1ZOofGII2TIcghONufmMrofQUUztmeRi1DfTK0nKvItPjb +w+kpe83c95yKwAEXLGD/FdlHzT6UXCpQ8LklCwQF6rOzf7aYDVFxjEY7ptzpPDisOXv cUk8gN6sKKtppYFqZdJCix9kTECpMJoyZyrYCV4W6y/YImkCHvg7teEJ1I5QvVhcTdw5 8e3lOsovagGZFSaMDZoe18Qzh0B8OCgbxUZ7G3HwgdntLLDe5we9V4dkfsEzHNWmj0TB Q8iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yuo/siThPMbmmCI7fgK4lDR+YScDPrtA84bm+jGn6JE=; b=S/f2tEzk+GA1Nt6KfkJUQa/bfVb9MtPP/N3MJLF4xy5Fck5eD5w3TQNtiPaD4QtONV rp29adhECpdeSmyCKrpWX5QzR0i6km0qnroyYSkbWCupR/HhAdS4KygDIElhDF8Fn8zm YKf0LIsOIc8tWXLJYbE0Bss0x195bEqkotNdG769qGqx/zBxVusREOcCRt7qNlQ2bz9i mT4cO7ll5YAaxd/+y9TVkULgRavaZFp+kLLMcTC9bcDMVSmnzKBZ5C96+JSLUUUL3StB 9HccoN94Zewfz2R7jbttKWDJGw3/YU3t2eE+g1zCIA5cmUQNqXjXaIBkx019vIsnQEqL rGEA==
X-Gm-Message-State ANhLgQ341E4nnw7sPThGGIg1p5Khgos23t38YGjdHVXux6UyxS7Gg8YU TEE6tsnpad3qdINjnub/VKk4NDQGg2GTZojz4m4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source ADFU+vsksMTXX+Bu7iwmG3BI91iTiCAEmEBq78kLcgGEQl5BrllDXRCnvv0CcxsRoQdZ4Ftom9hoUGHHCDBDUaXWqko=
X-Received by 2002:a17:906:2cd5:: with SMTP id r21mr8986242ejr.222.1585242395503; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <C46D87FD-947F-46CA-A03C-68E52E14BF5A@larryv.me>
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized.
X-Received-From 2a00:1450:4864:20::52a
X-Content-Filtered-By Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAB+qc9DGHtSxD_2cYkDnhzXYR-_C6civArEsfiwfECbWzCxigw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <CAB+qc9AAPQbzp92tv-FOR4Kh+2UdZyRwGiPOfNegVqv5UFnU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <C46D87FD-947F-46CA-A03C-68E52E14BF5A@larryv.me>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16045

Show key headers only | View raw


I keep on wondering why these shells can't come up with something better
than improving previous shell syntax by little by only providing poor
better alternatives.
I somehow think there is a need to rethink shells from scratch to make them
less mentally demanding and readable in the command prompt and scripts
themselves.
I really haven't seen anything that I would like to use so far. Neither
zsh, tcsh or any other of the more popular ones as far as I remember from
the last weeks "personal research".

2020-03-20, pn, 06:11 Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> rašė:

> > On Mar 12, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Vaidas BoQsc <vaidas.boqsc@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Are there any plans to have alternative, a more modern C or D like
> > syntaxes for IF statements, While loop and the like in Bash?
> >
> > Would it be better to just make a new shell and command language
> > similar to Bash instead of adding these alternatives?
>
> FWIW, some of zsh's complex commands have alternative forms that
> are visually more C-like, although they have some caveats and are
> (obviously) not even remotely portable.
>
>
> http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Shell-Grammar.html#Alternate-Forms-For-Complex-Commands
>
> vq

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? Vaidas BoQsc <vaidas.boqsc@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 19:05 +0200
  Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2020-03-26 17:23 +0000

csiph-web