Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16046
| From | Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? |
| Date | 2020-03-26 17:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.479.1585243415.3020.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAB+qc9AAPQbzp92tv-FOR4Kh+2UdZyRwGiPOfNegVqv5UFnU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <C46D87FD-947F-46CA-A03C-68E52E14BF5A@larryv.me> <CAB+qc9DGHtSxD_2cYkDnhzXYR-_C6civArEsfiwfECbWzCxigw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.477.1585242401.3020.bug-bash@gnu.org> <slrnr7pp8d.rf7.trepidation@vps.jonz.net> |
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:05:58 +0200, Vaidas BoQsc wrote: > I keep on wondering why these shells can't come up with something better > than improving previous shell syntax by little by only providing poor > better alternatives. > I somehow think there is a need to rethink shells from scratch to make them > less mentally demanding and readable in the command prompt and scripts > themselves. > I really haven't seen anything that I would like to use so far. Neither > zsh, tcsh or any other of the more popular ones as far as I remember from > the last weeks "personal research". You are always welcome to run perl as your shell. Or, even php !
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? Vaidas BoQsc <vaidas.boqsc@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 19:05 +0200 Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2020-03-26 17:23 +0000
csiph-web