Re: PDP-8 ASCII question

From	Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.prime
Subject	Re: PDP-8 ASCII question
Date	2016-04-05 03:48 +0200
Organization	Me, Myself and I
Message-ID	<m4ibtc-eca.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> (permalink)
References	<7ac59376-b031-44ac-9601-490ec29b3ece@googlegroups.com> <dmf3pdFs66uU6@mid.individual.net> <ah9atc-507.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> <3cSdnc2MWvG_jZ7KnZ2dnUU7-VfNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <3cSdnc2MWvG_jZ7KnZ2dnUU7-VfNnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Dennis Boone <drb@ihatespam.msu.edu> wrote:
> > ISTR that the earliest Primes (up to the 400, ISTR) were embrace-and-extend
> > versions of the DDP-5xx architecture. Later versions had compatibility-mode
> > (R-mode?) that ran DDP-516 code. 
>
>Prime called the x16 mode S mode.  As far as I know, it existed
>until the end.  Even the 100 and 200 had R-mode, though, the "embrace
>and extend".
>
>The P300 added virtual memory.

They sure had a lot of processor modes, S, R, I, V and IX. This puts even
a '486 and an ARM8 (with 64, 32 and 24 bit modes plus thumb2) to shame.

-- mrr

Back to comp.sys.prime | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-04-04 16:15 +0200
  Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-04-04 18:23 +0000
  Re: PDP-8 ASCII question drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2016-04-04 20:08 -0500
    Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-04-05 03:48 +0200
      Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Jim Wilcoxson <prirun@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:27 -0700
        Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-04-05 16:05 +0200
          Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Greg Field <greg.field.au@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:26 -0800
            Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Jim Wilcoxson <prirun@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:15 -0800

csiph-web