Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.prime > #305
| From | Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.prime |
| Subject | Re: PDP-8 ASCII question |
| Date | 2016-04-05 16:05 +0200 |
| Organization | Me, Myself and I |
| Message-ID | <9atctc-4ec.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> (permalink) |
| References | <7ac59376-b031-44ac-9601-490ec29b3ece@googlegroups.com> <3cSdnc2MWvG_jZ7KnZ2dnUU7-VfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <m4ibtc-eca.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> <58a75f84-abea-4d96-a79d-9ec639f6fc26@googlegroups.com> |
In article <58a75f84-abea-4d96-a79d-9ec639f6fc26@googlegroups.com>, Jim Wilcoxson <prirun@gmail.com> wrote: >On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 10:18:33 PM UTC-4, Morten Reistad wrote: >> In article <3cSdnc2MWvG_jZ7KnZ2dnUU7-VfNnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> Dennis Boone <drb@ihatespam.msu.edu> wrote: >> > > ISTR that the earliest Primes (up to the 400, ISTR) were embrace-and-extend >> > > versions of the DDP-5xx architecture. Later versions had compatibility-mode >> > > (R-mode?) that ran DDP-516 code. >> > >> >Prime called the x16 mode S mode. As far as I know, it existed >> >until the end. Even the 100 and 200 had R-mode, though, the "embrace >> >and extend". >> > >> >The P300 added virtual memory. >> >> They sure had a lot of processor modes, S, R, I, V and IX. This puts even >> a '486 and an ARM8 (with 64, 32 and 24 bit modes plus thumb2) to shame. >> >> -- mrr > >And within each processor mode are multiple addressing schemes indicated in a different way in each mode: > >- sector 0 relative >- program counter relative >- preindexed by index register >- postindexed by index register >- optional indirect >- base register relative (4 varieties) >- field address register relative >- general register relative >- gr indexed I discovered this in october 1984 when I read the processor and PMA manuals for Primos 19.3; while upgrading to 19.4. That was when I decided that I'll stick to procedural languages, after doing assembly programming for nearly a decade. First the 6502, then the PDP10, then the Z80, a little PDP11s, and then the Prime. After a few weeks with PMA I went for FTN, PLP, SPL and all the other Prime-specific stuff. -- mrr
Back to comp.sys.prime | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-04-04 16:15 +0200
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-04-04 18:23 +0000
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2016-04-04 20:08 -0500
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-04-05 03:48 +0200
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Jim Wilcoxson <prirun@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:27 -0700
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-04-05 16:05 +0200
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Greg Field <greg.field.au@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:26 -0800
Re: PDP-8 ASCII question Jim Wilcoxson <prirun@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:15 -0800
csiph-web