Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.cpm, comp.arch.embedded, comp.sys.misc |
| Subject | Re: CPU's and boards for hobbyists? |
| Followup-To | comp.sys.misc, comp.arch.embedded |
| Date | 2012-11-22 23:59 +0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <86ehjl7evp.fsf@gray.siamics.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <k7r9t4$r08$1@dont-email.me> <86mwylblow.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <7d1ba3e4-e34b-45a6-bd59-388cf3b80967@googlegroups.com> <861ufvb7cy.fsf_-_@gray.siamics.net> <o0jrs.1138$1k5.439@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.sys.misc, comp.arch.embedded
>>>>> Wilf <wilfredk@live.com> writes: [Cross-posting to news:comp.sys.misc, and dropping news:comp.os.cpm (in favor of the former) from Followup-To:.] > There is this one recently produced in Australia. The target market > is I think people who had one in the 80's. > http://www.microbeetechnology.com.au/ The point is that as a "remake", such a computer is not to be expected to be cheap. And, indeed, it isn't. For a "non-kit", one-board (cheap) computer, I'd probably check Raspberry Pi or the Gooseberry board. Both are ought to be rather fully-featured, with over than 29000 software packages readily available [1]. [1] http://www.debian.org/ > The Maximite was another on based on a PIC device. Quite different > but did have BASIC. http://geoffg.net/maximite.html I've mentioned DuinoMite (a derivative system from a different vendor) already in this thread. Unfortunately, the designer behind Maximite, and also the author of the MMBasic firmware bundled, has regretted his earlier choice to release MMBasic as free software, as the design has readily spawned a number of derivatives (including DuinoMite), whose respective authors not necessarily credited him, or at times provided inferior versions of the software, allegedly harming his reputation. ... A feature of the design is the use of the SPI interface to drive a VGA interface, which seems like a clever one (even if it wasn't the first time SPI was used for such a trick.) However, it made me wonder on what CPU frequency is used? (I see the crystal, but I presume the chip has an internal frequency multiplier.) Also, I see that while the ATmega8-family MCU's are able to drive SPI at half the core frequency, it's possible to get the system's clock output at the CLKO pin. I wonder if it may make sense to drive a parallel-to-serial chip (such as, e. g., 74HC165) to achieve the 20 MHz pixel clock for such an improvised VGA output? (I. e., instead of using the SPI-internal shift register.) -- FSF associate member #7257
Back to comp.sys.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: CPU's and boards for hobbyists? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-11-22 23:59 +0700
csiph-web