Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution

From	"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution
Date	2017-04-28 20:47 +0100
Organization	~
Message-ID	<op.yze7wwegjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <110420172014462908%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yyqs6aaxjs98qf@red.lan> <150420171159348504%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yyyb6jkhjs98qf@red.lan> <190420171331049070%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:31:04 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <op.yyyb6jkhjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword
> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>> >> >> An Epson with 4 colours, on decent paper, in the mode with the highest
>> >> >> resolution.  They look just like photos from a 35mm camera done in a
>> >> >> professional lab.
>> >> >
>> >> > either you're visually impaired or you use a very shitty lab.
>> >>
>> >> Since I can tell the difference between a 16M colour display and a 64K
>> >> colour
>> >> display, then I'm not visually impaired.  The 64K shows clear stripes as
>> >> the colour changes across say a blue sky.
>> >
>> > that has nothing to do with printers.
>> >
>> > you are clueless.
>>
>> I just told you the number of colours producible from 3.
>
> actually you didn't,

I repeat, 16 million.

> and what you also fail to understand is that the
> number is not as important as how wide of a *range* it is. quality
> versus quantity.

They are all distinguishable.

-- 
Polynesia -- memory loss in parrots.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 20:47 +0100

csiph-web