Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Organization	~
Message-ID	<op.yyu0zuejjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <140420171635574410%nospam@nospam.invalid> <op.yypd61o7js98qf@red.lan> <ocreg2$92o$1@dont-email.me> <op.yypiy2egjs98qf@red.lan> <ocs00t$rk4$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:20:13 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:48:28 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:21:07 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:05:15 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:35:57 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <op.yypck4s1js98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword
>>>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Windows 7 is easy to get for free.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > not legally it isn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I never said anything about legally.
>>>>>
>>>>> then you're a criminal.
>>>>
>>>> So are half the population in some way or another.  Get used to it.
>>>
>>> Thinkof all those people doing side jobs, and not paying income or Social
>>> Security taxes.
>>> All criminals.
>>> Every babysitter would do time.
>>>
>>> Felon: "What are you in for?"
>>> Sitter: "Watching Timmy, bitch!"
>>
>> Now imagine 90% of people in jail (because that's what you'd get).  The gullible 10% who play by the rules would have to pay for them.
>>
>>>>>> >> Which used to (and still does?) upgrade to 10 for free.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > the free upgrade ended last summer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's a workaround - you pretend you're disabled.  Something to do with
>>>>>> activating the ease of access controls.
>>>>>
>>>>> like i said, you're a criminal.
>>>>>
>>>>> do you steal from stores too or just software companies?
>>>>
>>>> Not the same kind of theft.  If I copy a piece of software or an mp3, they still have the original.  If I steal a TV from a store, they have one less TV.
>>>>
>>>>>> >> Isn't MacOS just linux with another GUI on top?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > fuck no. it's way more advanced than that. *way* more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's more fluffy, nice little icons for kids to use.  But you can't say
>>>>>> anything is more advanced than linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> linux wishes it was as advanced.
>>>>>
>>>>> modern state of the art software targets mac and windows. not linux.
>>>>
>>>> Because they're more popular, not necessarily better.
>>>
>>> I always figured Windows and Mac had Photoshop because their users were
>>> uglier.
>>
>> Er....
>> http://i.imgur.com/A7mbk.jpg
>>
>
> Mac user.
> The ghostbuster tshirt is a dead give-away.
>
> Linux user...
> http://imgur.com/a/dC42Y

No, linux users:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RW_K7_YgMYg/maxresdefault.jpg

-- 
The problem with today's society is adults are treated like children, children are treated like retards, and retards are exempt from the law.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> - 2017-04-15 08:06 +0200
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700

csiph-web